{"uid":"cap_yggwsJjX7h3CZl9rYkFbT","slug":"batcave-evidence-judge-212e200b","name":"Batcave Evidence Judge","description":"Batcave Evidence Judge: independent evidence-bound review of a proposed agent action with pass/caution/reject structured output.","url":"https://playstation-newbie-mary-enhancement.trycloudflare.com/v1/review-decision","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"risk":{"enum":["low","medium","high"],"type":"string"},"task":{"enum":["review_decision"],"type":"string"},"job_id":{"type":"string","maxLength":128},"evidence":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string","maxLength":1000},"maxItems":16},"proposed_action":{"type":"string","maxLength":2000,"minLength":1},"reasoning_summary":{"type":"string","maxLength":4000}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.02","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"registry","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.02/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.02","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.02","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_crTdek7542jZbG3OPm269","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.02","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Independently reviews a proposed agent action against provided evidence and returns a structured pass/caution/reject verdict","exampleAgentPrompt":"Before you actually send that refund of $500 to the customer, run an independent evidence review — the risk level is high, here's my reasoning summary and the 3 evidence items I found — and only proceed if you get a pass verdict.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"High-risk financial action gating","prompt":"Before the agent transfers funds to the new vendor, run an evidence review at high risk level with these 5 pieces of evidence I've gathered, and block the transfer if the verdict is anything other than pass."},{"title":"Autonomous code deployment safety check","prompt":"My agent wants to deploy a hotfix to production — can you do an evidence-bound review at medium risk using the change log, test results, and approval email as evidence, and give me a pass, caution, or reject before it proceeds?"},{"title":"Content moderation escalation decision","prompt":"Review whether the proposed action of permanently banning this user account is justified — risk is high, here's the reasoning summary and the 4 evidence items including the flagged posts and prior warnings."}],"resultDescription":"A structured verdict of pass, caution, or reject indicating whether the proposed action is sufficiently supported by the provided evidence, along with structured output suitable for automated decision gating in an agent pipeline.","failureModes":["Empty or missing proposed_action field returns validation error","Evidence array exceeding 16 items is rejected","Reasoning summary exceeding 4000 characters is truncated or rejected","Invalid risk enum value causes schema validation failure","Ambiguous or contradictory evidence may produce cautious rather than definitive verdicts","Network timeout on Cloudflare tunnel may cause intermittent failures","Payment not received results in 402 response before review is processed"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need an independent, evidence-bound safety gate before an autonomous agent executes a consequential or irreversible action, especially at medium or high risk levels. It is particularly valuable in agentic pipelines where a second-opinion check is required to prevent hallucinated reasoning from driving real-world actions. Prefer it over internal self-review when you need an externally auditable, structured pass/caution/reject record.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-15T06:35:44.575Z","isFirstParty":false}