{"uid":"cap_xsC1P90dRhzyRexE43eQk","slug":"editorial-review-base-100-series-two-measure-correlation-96079c47","name":"Editorial Review Base-100 Series + Two-Measure Correlation","description":"Editorial review — Base-100 series + Two-measure correlation: Base-100 series + Two-measure correlation for supplied editorial review records (comment_count, resolved_comments). Up to 200 rows; 2 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 2 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-writing-03-165?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","document_group","date","comment_count","resolved_comments"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"comment_count":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"document_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80},"resolved_comments":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","comment_count":10,"document_group":"group-a","resolved_comments":1},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","comment_count":20,"document_group":"group-b","resolved_comments":2},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","comment_count":15,"document_group":"group-a","resolved_comments":3},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","comment_count":30,"document_group":"group-b","resolved_comments":4}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1},"field":{"enum":["comment_count","resolved_comments"],"type":"string","default":"comment_count"},"base_index":{"type":"integer","default":0,"maximum":199,"minimum":0}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_1EJhe9VOiX1pMMMVL2s8e","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Computes a base-100 indexed time series and Pearson correlation between comment_count and resolved_comments for up to 200 editorial review records","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a base-100 series and two-measure correlation on my editorial review data? I have 4 rows with comment_count and resolved_comments across two document groups (group-a and group-b) from October 2026, and I want the index to start from row 0 (base_index = 0), using comment_count as the primary field.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Tracking comment resolution trends over time","prompt":"I have weekly editorial review records for the past month across two document groups — can you index the comment_count to base-100 starting from week 1 and also tell me how strongly comment_count and resolved_comments are correlated?"},{"title":"Editorial workflow efficiency analysis","prompt":"Here are 50 rows of editorial review data with dates, comment counts, and resolved comment counts for our document groups. Run a base-100 series on resolved_comments starting from index 0 and compute the correlation between comment_count and resolved_comments so I can see if our resolution rate tracks with volume."},{"title":"Comparing document group review activity","prompt":"I want to understand the review dynamics in group-a versus group-b. Can you take my editorial records — each has a date, comment_count, and resolved_comments — and produce a base-100 indexed series plus the two-measure correlation between those two fields?"}],"resultDescription":"Returns two analytical reports: (1) a base-100 indexed series for the specified field (comment_count or resolved_comments) anchored to the chosen base_index row, showing relative change over time; and (2) a Pearson or equivalent correlation coefficient between comment_count and resolved_comments across all supplied rows. Results are computed locally with no external lookups.","failureModes":["Rows array empty or missing — validation error returned","More than 200 rows supplied — request rejected with schema violation","base_index out of range (>=number of rows) — index error","Null values in comment_count or resolved_comments may affect correlation calculation","Invalid date format (not YYYY-MM-DD) causes schema rejection","Missing required fields (row_id, document_group, date) cause row-level validation failure"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need both a base-100 normalized time series AND a two-measure correlation for editorial review data (comment_count vs resolved_comments) in a single $0.01 call covering up to 200 rows. Prefer it over generic stats services when your data is already structured with document_group, date, row_id fields and you want two coordinated analytical outputs without any external data lookup or prediction.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-23T12:50:04.701Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"editorial-review-base-100-series-two-measure-correlation-96079c47"}