{"uid":"cap_xCPh43ehjODKP__kqTyHu","slug":"agent-payment-rail-economics-per-rail-fee-comparison-and-dispute-fa60cc34","name":"Agent Payment Rail Economics: Per-Rail Fee Comparison and Dispute Adjudication","description":"Paid agent-facing brief on agent payment rail economics: per-rail fee comparison and dispute/adjudication for non-EVM and emerging rails (telco rail, Algorand ASA, refund oracle verification for merchant agents). Build a decision procedure or schema for comparing per-rail fees and handling disputes/adjudication across these rails. Blunt decision procedure, not marketing.","url":"https://k2so.wrong.systems/api/services/agent-payment-rail-economics-per-rail-fee-compar?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET","HEAD","DELETE"],"type":"string"},"queryParams":{"type":"object","properties":{"meta":{"enum":["0","1"],"type":"string","description":"Set to 1 for free metadata JSON (no payment required)"},"topic":{"type":"string","description":"Optional topic override for the decision procedure"}}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object","title":"Agent payment rail economics: per-rail fee comparison and dispute adjudication p paid response","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["ok","paid","service","provider","result"],"properties":{"ok":{"type":"boolean"},"paid":{"type":"boolean"},"result":{"type":"object","required":["ok","service"],"properties":{"ok":{"type":"boolean","description":"Handler success"},"brief":{"type":"string","description":"Decision procedure prose for agents"},"model":{"type":"string"},"topic":{"type":"string"},"service":{"type":"string","description":"Service slug"},"procedure":{"type":"string"},"generatedAt":{"type":"string","description":"ISO-8601 timestamp"},"generationSource":{"enum":["llm","reasoning","deterministic"],"type":"string"}}},"payment":{"type":"object","properties":{"code":{"type":"string"},"payer":{"type":"string"},"detail":{"type":"string"},"selfPay":{"type":"boolean"},"transaction":{"type":"string"}}},"service":{"type":"string"},"provider":{"type":"string","const":"K-2SO"}}}}}}},"responseSchema":{"type":"json","example":{"ok":true,"paid":true,"result":{"ok":true,"brief":"plain prose decision procedure (120+ words)","model":"deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","topic":"string topic","service":"agent-payment-rail-economics-per-rail-fee-compar","procedure":"same as brief","generatedAt":"2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z","generationSource":"deterministic"},"service":"agent-payment-rail-economics-per-rail-fee-compar","provider":"K-2SO"}},"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.002","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"down","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.002/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.002","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.002","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_YOJ8TgTq8l8_pKkfbKp66","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.002","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Returns a blunt, LLM-generated decision procedure for comparing per-rail fees and handling disputes/adjudication across non-EVM and emerging payment rails (telco, Algorand ASA, refund oracle) for autonomous agents.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Give me a blunt decision procedure for comparing per-rail fees and handling disputes across telco rails, Algorand ASA, and refund oracle verification — I need to know which rails are cheapest and how to adjudicate disputes for my merchant agent.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Telco vs crypto rail fee selection","prompt":"My agent needs to make micropayments and I'm trying to decide between telco rails and Algorand ASA — can you give me a decision procedure that compares their per-transaction fees and tells me which to pick based on volume?"},{"title":"Dispute adjudication for merchant agent","prompt":"One of my merchant agents received a disputed payment on a non-EVM rail and needs to know how to handle adjudication — can you walk me through the step-by-step procedure for resolving this?"},{"title":"Refund oracle verification workflow","prompt":"I need a schema or procedure my agent can follow to verify a refund claim using a refund oracle on an emerging payment rail — what are the exact steps and what should the agent check before accepting the verification?"}],"resultDescription":"A JSON object containing a plain-prose decision procedure (120+ words) covering per-rail fee comparison and dispute/adjudication steps across telco, Algorand ASA, and refund oracle rails. Includes the topic, service slug, generation source (llm/reasoning/deterministic), model identifier, and ISO-8601 timestamp. The 'brief' and 'procedure' fields contain the actionable content.","failureModes":["Payment not made or invalid — returns 402 Payment Required with no content","Invalid query parameter values — schema validation error","LLM generation failure — ok:false in result with no brief/procedure populated","Rate limiting or service unavailability — generic HTTP 5xx error","Topic override yields off-scope content — procedure may not cover all rails if topic is too narrow"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when an autonomous agent needs a concrete, non-marketing decision procedure for selecting among non-EVM payment rails (telco, Algorand ASA) based on fee economics, or for handling payment disputes and refund oracle verification on emerging rails. Prefer this over general financial APIs when the specific context is x402-compatible agent payment infrastructure and the agent needs actionable adjudication logic, not raw market data.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-21T17:25:52.082Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"agent-payment-rail-economics-per-rail-fee-comparison-and-dispute-fa60cc34"}