{"uid":"cap_vrvHojp58HMfqoo4Tsg_i","slug":"pulsenetwork-vendor-counterparty-due-diligence-memo-f8e40659","name":"PulseNetwork Vendor & Counterparty Due-Diligence Memo","description":"Vendor / counterparty due-diligence memo: OFAC sanctions screen (alias-aware, deterministic), GLEIF legal-entity lookup, media-narrative-vs-court-record check, and — if you pass a token address — a deterministic on-chain token safety verdict. Composed from live PulseNetwork engines into one memo with an honest per-source coverage block.","url":"https://pulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/hire/vendor-dd-memo","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET","HEAD","DELETE"],"type":"string"},"queryParams":{"type":"object","properties":{"chain":{"type":"string"},"country":{"type":"string"},"jurisdiction":{"type":"string"},"company_or_token":{"type":"string"}}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"errors":{"type":"object","description":"Documented error responses, keyed by HTTP status code","additionalProperties":{"type":"object","required":["description"],"properties":{"example":{"type":"object"},"description":{"type":"string"}}}},"example":{"type":"object"}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"5","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$5/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"5","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"5","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_wpgKrI9tGqhU7Tk9tYhCV","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"5","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Generates a consolidated due-diligence memo covering OFAC sanctions screening, GLEIF legal-entity data, media vs. court-record narrative check, and optional on-chain token safety verdict for a named vendor or counterparty.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a full vendor due-diligence memo on 'Meridian Trade Solutions LLC' — check them against OFAC sanctions (including aliases), pull their GLEIF legal-entity record, look for any media or court-record red flags, and if their token address is 0xAbC123...def, include the on-chain token safety verdict?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Onboarding new supplier compliance check","prompt":"Before we onboard GlobalParts GmbH as a supplier, can you pull a due-diligence memo on them — OFAC sanctions screen with alias matching, their GLEIF legal-entity entry, and any adverse media or court records I should know about?"},{"title":"Crypto token counterparty risk review","prompt":"We're about to wire funds to a DeFi protocol. Can you run a counterparty due-diligence memo on 'Nexus Finance Ltd' and also check their token at address 0x4e83...c91f for on-chain safety issues?"},{"title":"Pre-contract vendor background check","prompt":"I need a quick due-diligence memo on Orion Logistics SA before we sign a distribution agreement — sanctions screen, GLEIF identity confirmation, and a check for any court records contradicting their public media narrative."}],"resultDescription":"A structured due-diligence memo containing: (1) OFAC sanctions screen result with alias-aware deterministic verdict, (2) GLEIF legal-entity lookup data including LEI and registration status, (3) media narrative vs. court-record discrepancy analysis, (4) optionally a deterministic on-chain token safety verdict if a token address was provided, and (5) an honest per-source coverage block indicating data availability and confidence for each section.","failureModes":["Company name not found in GLEIF registry — memo notes missing LEI with partial coverage","OFAC name too ambiguous to screen deterministically — returns low-confidence flag requiring human review","Token address malformed or unsupported chain — token safety section omitted with error note","Counterparty has no media footprint — media/court section returns no-data coverage note","Payment of $5 USDC not received — request rejected with 402 Payment Required","Rate limit or service timeout — returns 503 with retry guidance"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a single consolidated due-diligence memo combining sanctions screening, legal entity verification, and adverse media checks — especially when alias-aware OFAC screening and GLEIF lookup in one call matter. Prefer it over point-solution APIs when you want a unified coverage report with honest data-gap disclosures. Particularly valuable when a token address is also in scope, as no other single endpoint combines on-chain token safety with traditional counterparty KYC signals.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-14T00:40:53.499Z","isFirstParty":false}