{"uid":"cap_vYdh2gMYCSOQX1hCMyoNP","slug":"business-frameworks-market-shock-pass-through-verdict-market-decide-6232af81","name":"Business Frameworks – Market Shock Pass-Through Verdict (market/decide/shock@1.2)","description":"Business Frameworks · business-frameworks/market/decide/shock@1.2, applied — POST the shock type, the node's marginal buyer tiers, the propensity read, the driver share, lead time and horizon, and an analog if one exists; get the verdict steps and the lag that reach the seat, with the transfer test applied. Deterministic (the node's rule, no model): figures, verdict, action and check with the 298-token node text — schema free at GET /apply/market/decide/shock.","url":"https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/market/decide/shock?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method","bodyType","body"],"properties":{"body":{"type":"object","required":["shock_type","tier_mix_marginal","propensity_read","driver_share","lead_time_months","horizon_months"],"properties":{"analog":{"type":"object","required":["verdict_steps","tier_mix"],"properties":{"tier_mix":{"type":"object","properties":{"t1":{"type":"number"},"t2":{"type":"number"},"t3":{"type":"number"},"t4":{"type":"number"}},"description":"The buyer tiers of that shock's marginal demand, same shape as tier_mix_marginal."},"lag_months":{"type":"integer","minimum":0,"description":"Months from that shock to the move. Optional; default 0."},"verdict_steps":{"type":"integer","minimum":0,"description":"How many verdict steps toward pass-through the node moved in the historical shock the caller names."}},"description":"Optional: a historical shock to carry, if its buyer tiers match today's."},"shock_type":{"enum":["A","B","C","D"],"type":"string","description":"A: end demand collapses. B: suppliers overbuild in a capacity race. C: credit to tier 3 and 4 buyers tightens. D: policy — export or materials controls, interconnection rules, priority orders."},"driver_share":{"type":"number","maximum":1,"minimum":0,"description":"Share of the node's demand that comes from the chain's demand driver."},"horizon_months":{"type":"integer","minimum":1,"description":"The planning horizon in months."},"dispersion_flag":{"type":"boolean","description":"true if the node's entities are expected to fare very differently in the shock although the market-level magnitude is one number. Optional; default false."},"propensity_read":{"enum":["rent","ceded","mixed"],"type":"string","description":"As on market/decide/pricing-power."},"lead_time_months":{"type":"integer","minimum":0,"description":"The node's lead time to add capacity, in months."},"tier_mix_marginal":{"type":"object","properties":{"t1":{"type":"number","maximum":1,"minimum":0,"description":"Share of marginal demand from tier 1 buyers: cash-funded, investment grade."},"t2":{"type":"number","maximum":1,"minimum":0,"description":"Share from tier 2 buyers: rate-base regulated."},"t3":{"type":"number","maximum":1,"minimum":0,"description":"Share from tier 3 buyers: contracted leverage."},"t4":{"type":"number","maximum":1,"minimum":0,"description":"Share from tier 4 buyers: merchant and speculative."}},"description":"Shares of the node's marginal demand by buyer tier, summing to about 1. Tier 1 cash-funded investment grade; 2 rate-base regulated; 3 contracted leverage; 4 merchant and speculative."}},"description":"Shares and weights are fractions from 0 to 1 (0.65 means 65%). Scores run 0 to 10. Force scores are whole numbers 1 to 5, scored as pressure on the seller's margins (1 weak, 5 strong). Months are whole numbers. Years are calendar years for crossing and base, and a count for the horizon."},"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["POST"],"type":"string"},"bodyType":{"enum":["json","form-data","text"],"type":"string"}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object"}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.05","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"registry","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.05/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.05","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.05","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_q3zIjx9fYpppmImzi2vA8","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.05","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":null,"unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Applies a deterministic supply-chain shock rule to produce a verdict on whether a market node can pass through a given shock, including step count, lag, and a transfer test.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Run the shock pass-through verdict for my supply chain node: it's a type A end-demand collapse shock, the marginal buyer mix is 60% tier 1 and 40% tier 2, propensity is 'rent', driver share is 0.7, lead time is 6 months, and I'm looking at a 24-month horizon — tell me the verdict steps, lag, and whether it passes the transfer test.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Policy shock impact on industrial supplier","prompt":"We're an industrial parts supplier facing new export controls — that's a type D shock. Our marginal buyers are 50% tier 1 and 50% tier 3, propensity is 'mixed', driver share is 0.55, lead time is 9 months, and our horizon is 18 months. Can you run the shock verdict and tell us how many steps and how long before it hits our seat, and whether we pass the transfer test?"},{"title":"Demand collapse triage for a distribution node","prompt":"Our distribution node is exposed to a type A end-demand collapse. Marginal buyer tiers are 30% T1, 50% T2, 20% T3, propensity is 'ceded', driver share is 0.8, lead time is 3 months, horizon is 12 months. Apply the shock framework and give me the verdict steps, lag, and recommended action."},{"title":"Credit tightening scenario with historical analog","prompt":"Run a type C credit-tightening shock analysis for our node — marginal buyers are 40% T2 and 60% T3, propensity is 'rent', driver share is 0.45, lead time is 5 months, horizon is 24 months. We have a 2008 analog where we moved 2 verdict steps with the same tier mix and a 4-month lag — carry that through and tell me the full verdict."}],"resultDescription":"Returns the number of verdict steps toward pass-through the node can achieve, the estimated lag in months before the shock reaches the seat, the result of the transfer test (pass/fail), a recommended action, a check condition, and the 298-token node rule text explaining the deterministic logic applied.","failureModes":["Missing required fields (shock_type, tier_mix_marginal, propensity_read, driver_share, lead_time_months, horizon_months) returns a validation error","Invalid shock_type enum value (not A/B/C/D) returns a schema error","Invalid propensity_read value (not rent/ceded/mixed) returns a schema error","driver_share outside [0,1] range returns a validation error","Analog provided with mismatched tier_mix shape causes transfer test to be skipped or flagged","Payment not included or insufficient USDC returns 402 Payment Required"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a deterministic, rule-based verdict on shock pass-through for a specific supply-chain market node — particularly when you have structured inputs for buyer tier mix, propensity, driver share, and lead time. Prefer this over general LLM reasoning when you need a reproducible, schema-consistent verdict with an explicit transfer test and lag estimate rather than a probabilistic narrative answer.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-17T06:49:32.470Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"business-frameworks-market-shock-pass-through-verdict-market-decide-6232af81"}