{"uid":"cap_tObCtlW5j-jjSleIZRVU1","slug":"synthora-business-risk-verdict-d367f233","name":"SYNTHORA Business Risk Verdict","description":"Counterparty business-risk verdict: one call fuses OFAC/EU sanctions screening, on-chain wallet reputation, and token/pool contract risk into a single weighted risk_score (0-100), a kill/pivot/proceed verdict, and reason_codes naming which sub-signal drove it. Weights: sanctions 0.50, wallet 0.30, token 0.20, renormalised if a leg is unavailable; a sanctions hit is a hard KILL floor. Degrades gracefully — a failed sub-check is dropped, never crashes the verdict. Deterministic, no LLM, Ed25519-signed. 0.05 USDC via x402 on Base. SYNTHORA.","url":"https://api.hergertsynthora.com/v1/businessrisk","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"token":{"type":"string","description":"Token or pool contract (0x-40hex) — screened for contract risk"},"address":{"type":"string","description":"Counterparty EVM wallet (0x-40hex) — screened for sanctions + reputation"},"apy_pct":{"type":"number","description":"Optional APY passthrough to the DeFi risk leg"},"tvl_usd":{"type":"number","description":"Optional TVL passthrough to the DeFi risk leg"},"protocol":{"type":"string","description":"Optional protocol name for the token/pool"},"duration_days":{"type":"integer","description":"Optional holding period passthrough"}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.05","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.05/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.05","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.05","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_9qsgEhPfFlA6OMzkh96T9","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.05","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Fuses OFAC/EU sanctions screening, on-chain wallet reputation, and token/pool contract risk into a single weighted risk score, verdict, and reason codes for a counterparty or DeFi position","exampleAgentPrompt":"Before I send funds, run a full business risk check on wallet 0xAbCd1234...5678 and token contract 0x9eFa...1234 — I need the risk score, verdict, and what drove it, especially whether it hits any sanctions lists.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Sanctions screen before DeFi swap","prompt":"Can you check wallet 0x3A7c...f901 against OFAC and EU sanctions lists and give me a risk verdict before I send 50k USDC to them?"},{"title":"Token contract risk before LP deposit","prompt":"I'm about to deposit into a liquidity pool — token contract is 0xD4e2...8830 on Uniswap with 120% APY and $2M TVL. Can you score the contract risk and tell me if I should proceed?"},{"title":"Counterparty due diligence for institutional trade","prompt":"We're onboarding a new counterparty; their wallet is 0x7Bc3...44aA. Run a full sanctions and on-chain reputation check and flag any reason codes that would block the deal."}],"resultDescription":"Returns a risk_score from 0 to 100, a three-way verdict (KILL / PIVOT / PROCEED), and structured reason_codes identifying which sub-signal (sanctions, wallet reputation, or token/contract risk) drove the outcome. Weights are 0.50 sanctions, 0.30 wallet, 0.20 token, renormalized if a leg is unavailable. A sanctions hit is a hard KILL regardless of other scores. The response is Ed25519-signed and deterministic.","failureModes":["Invalid or malformed address format (not 0x + 40 hex chars) returns a validation error","If all sub-checks fail simultaneously, verdict may be unavailable — but individual sub-check failures degrade gracefully by dropping that leg and renormalizing weights","Stale or unresolvable token contract may cause the token leg to be dropped","Payment failure via x402 (insufficient USDC on Base) will block the call","Rate limiting or provider downtime on underlying sanctions or chain-data feeds may reduce verdict confidence"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a single deterministic, signed risk verdict that combines sanctions screening, on-chain wallet history, and smart contract risk in one call rather than querying OFAC lists, chain analytics, and token auditors separately. It is ideal for pre-transaction compliance checks in DeFi workflows, agent-driven trading pipelines, or institutional counterparty onboarding where auditability (Ed25519 signature) and explainability (reason_codes) matter. Prefer it over generic AML tools when on-chain reputation and token contract risk are relevant, not just identity-layer sanctions.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-14T18:52:07.708Z","isFirstParty":false}