{"uid":"cap_qRH5aPENThwLoZCLOumg6","slug":"project-legitimacy-scan-45f96a0f","name":"Project Legitimacy Scan","description":"Fast structural + claims legitimacy read on a token project, cache-or-live.","url":"https://api.whitepapergrey.com/v1/cdp/offerings/legitimacy_scan","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"project_name":{"type":"string"},"token_address":{"type":"string"}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.25","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.25/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.25","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.25","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_WLxTIo1eUsepOD_eHEWOu","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.25","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Performs a fast structural and claims-based legitimacy assessment of a token or crypto project, returning a cached or live read on its credibility.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you do a legitimacy scan on the token project called GreyFi with contract address 0x4f3a...b12c — I want to know if it looks structurally credible or if there are red flags in its claims?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-investment token due diligence","prompt":"Before I put any money into this project called NovaDex with token address 0xabc123...def456, can you run a legitimacy scan on it and tell me if the claims hold up or if anything looks sketchy?"},{"title":"Screening new token listings","prompt":"I'm building a watchlist of new DeFi tokens — can you scan 'LunarYield' at address 0x789...fed to check whether it looks like a real project or a potential scam before I add it?"},{"title":"Investigating a suspicious airdrop","prompt":"Someone just sent me an airdrop from a project called 'GemPad Protocol' — can you run a legitimacy scan on it so I can figure out if it's a real project or something I should avoid interacting with?"}],"resultDescription":"Returns a fast structural and claims-based legitimacy assessment of the queried token project, including credibility signals, potential red flags, and an overall legitimacy read — sourced from cache if previously scanned, or live if not.","failureModes":["Unknown project name or token address returns insufficient data for assessment","Invalid token address format causes input validation error","Project too new or obscure to have meaningful structural signals","Cache miss combined with live fetch timeout results in delayed or empty response","Ambiguous project name with multiple matches may return results for wrong project"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when you need a quick, affordable ($0.25) structural credibility check on a token project before deeper research or investment — especially useful for flagging obvious red flags, validating project claims, or screening new or unfamiliar tokens. Prefer this over manual whitepaper review when speed matters and you want a cached or live fast read rather than a deep audit.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-16T00:32:56.217Z","isFirstParty":false}