{"uid":"cap_p0-D_5dmgRfsPpJzeIkBm","slug":"reactionpulse-quick-fb8de048","name":"ReactionPulse Quick","description":"Quick audience reaction check: sentiment analysis and customer feedback simulation for a product launch, announcement, pricing change or decision from 3 stakeholder perspectives. POST JSON {prompt, context?}. Strict JSON: sentiment, objections, risks, fixes. $0.15 USDC on Base, ~10 s.","url":"https://reactionpulse-production.reactionpulse-x402.workers.dev/v1/reaction/quick","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"prompt":{"type":"string","maxLength":6000,"minLength":8,"description":"The subject to simulate reactions to: a product launch, announcement, price change, decision, news item, hypothesis, proposal or URL description. Plain text."},"context":{"type":"string","maxLength":4000,"description":"Optional background: company, market, target segment, constraints, prior history."},"audience":{"type":"string","maxLength":200,"description":"Optional primary audience the subject targets."},"perspectives":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string","maxLength":40},"maxItems":8,"description":"Optional preferred perspectives. Suggested values: customer, skeptical_customer, developer, investor, competitor, early_adopter, analyst, content_creator, regulatory_risk, market, employee, partner. Free-text roles are accepted."},"output_language":{"type":"string","default":"en","pattern":"^[a-z]{2}(-[A-Za-z]{2})?$","description":"ISO language code for the output text."}}},"responseSchema":{"type":"json","example":{"meta":{"model":"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001","network":"eip155:8453","provider":"anthropic","price_usd":"0.49","tokens_in":1602,"latency_ms":35339,"tokens_out":1256},"version":"0.1.0","confidence":0.72,"disclaimer":"Analytical multi-perspective simulation generated by a language model. It does not represent real people, a survey, or calibrated probabilities, and it does not predict future events with certainty.","request_id":"30af5e94-8f21-430e-8b04-10868494e6a0","generated_at":"2026-09-11T19:20:57.855Z","perspectives":[{"role":"law_firm_partner","stance":"negative","headline":"Doubling costs without clear ROI justification.","reasoning":"Price doubles while value-add is one feature; partners will demand proof that matter summaries save billable time before accepting the increase.","sentiment":28,"top_appeal":"Automatic matter summaries could cut admin time","top_concern":"100% price increase against a 2026 no-increase promise"},{"role":"skeptical_customer","stance":"negative","headline":"A broken promise, not an upgrade.","reasoning":"Existing customers were told prices would not rise in 2026; forcing a migration to $199 reads as bait-and-switch regardless of the new feature.","sentiment":22,"top_appeal":"None unless grandfathering is offered","top_concern":"Trust erosion and forced migration"},{"role":"competitor","stance":"positive","headline":"An opening to poach price-sensitive firms.","reasoning":"Rivals at $49-149 can run switching campaigns aimed at the 1,200 customers who feel misled by the increase.","sentiment":74,"top_appeal":"Immediate churn opportunity","top_concern":"Company X bundling more AI features later"},{"role":"analyst","stance":"mixed","headline":"Revenue upside real, churn risk underpriced.","reasoning":"Doubling ARPU lifts revenue only if churn stays below roughly 50%; a promise reversal makes that assumption fragile.","sentiment":46,"top_appeal":"Higher ARPU and AI positioning","top_concern":"Churn among existing customers"}],"failure_modes":[{"likelihood":"high","description":"Existing customers churn to $49-149 competitors citing the broken promise."},{"likelihood":"medium","description":"Summaries produce errors in client matters, triggering distrust."}],"input_integrity":{"notes":"","status":"clean"},"subject_summary":"Company X launches a $199/month AI note-taker for law firms, doubling the price from $99 while adding automatic matter summaries and replacing the previous plan tier.","controversy_score":68,"key_uncertainties":["Actual time saved per matter by the summaries.","Whether the new plan includes other upgrades not described."],"likely_objections":["The 2026 no-increase promise is being broken.","A 100% price increase is not justified by a single new feature.","$199 sits above the $49-149 competitor range."],"overall_sentiment":42,"market_implications":["Competitors launch switching campaigns targeting Company X customers.","Price anchors in legaltech move toward AI-tiered plans."],"negative_probability":0.62,"positive_probability":0.38,"recommended_adjustments":["Honor the 2026 price lock for existing customers; grandfather them at $99.","Offer $199 as an optional AI tier with a 30-day accuracy trial."],"likely_positive_reactions":["Automatic matter summaries address a real time sink.","Positions Company X as an AI-forward legaltech vendor."]}},"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.15","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.15/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.15","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.15","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_YqeScX-6PgOpX0gS79Jrc","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.15","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Simulates audience sentiment and reactions to a product launch, announcement, pricing change, or decision from 3 stakeholder perspectives, returning structured JSON with sentiment scores, objections, risks, and suggested fixes.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a quick reaction simulation on this announcement: 'We are raising our Pro plan from $99 to $199 per month starting next quarter, and adding AI-powered matter summaries'? Check it from the customer, skeptical_customer, and investor perspectives, and use our SaaS legal-tech context where we promised no price increases in 2026.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-launch product announcement check","prompt":"Before we send out our launch email tomorrow, simulate how our customers, early adopters, and skeptical customers will react to this announcement: 'We are launching a new AI-powered contract review feature, available only on the $299 Enterprise tier.' Flag any objections or risks we should address first."},{"title":"Pricing change risk assessment","prompt":"We are thinking of doubling our subscription price from $49 to $99 next month. Can you quickly simulate the reactions from a law_firm_partner, a skeptical_customer, and a competitor perspective, so we know what objections and churn risks to expect before we commit?"},{"title":"Internal decision stakeholder simulation","prompt":"We are deciding to sunset our free tier entirely and push all free users to a paid plan. Simulate how our employees, investors, and existing customers would react to this decision — I need the sentiment scores, top concerns, and any fixes we should consider."}],"resultDescription":"Returns a JSON object containing a perspectives array with one entry per stakeholder role, each with: role, stance (positive/negative/mixed), headline, reasoning, sentiment score (0-100), top_appeal, and top_concern. Also includes a confidence score, disclaimer, model/latency metadata, and a request_id.","failureModes":["Prompt too short (under 8 characters) returns validation error","Prompt exceeds 6000-character limit returns 400 error","Invalid ISO language code for output_language returns validation error","Too many perspectives (over 8) returns validation error","Model timeout or provider error may result in latency exceeding expected ~10s","Payment failure or insufficient USDC balance returns 402 Payment Required","Ambiguous or very short prompts may yield low confidence scores and generic reactions"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose ReactionPulse Quick when you need a fast (~10s), low-cost ($0.15) structured reaction simulation from exactly 3 stakeholder perspectives with no configuration overhead. Prefer the sibling ReactionPulse endpoint when you need deeper analysis across 4-6 perspectives with more nuanced output. Best suited for rapid pre-decision checks, lightweight A/B testing of messaging, or automated pipeline steps where speed and structured JSON output matter more than exhaustive coverage.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-15T12:31:04.984Z","isFirstParty":false}