{"uid":"cap_oQ8LMgEzGbsLZsXlH0ExM","slug":"verity-suite-concord-policy-compliance-checker-1fc5a184","name":"Verity Suite Concord — Policy Compliance Checker","description":"The trust fabric for AI agents — calibrated, fail-closed services agents pay per call.","url":"https://verity-suite.onrender.com/concord","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","required":["text","policy"],"properties":{"text":{"type":"string","description":"the output or text to evaluate for compliance against the policy"},"scope":{"type":"string","description":"optional note on which clauses or aspects matter most, or what 'compliant' means in this context"},"policy":{"type":"string","description":"the policy, spec, or contract text to check against, ideally with clause numbers or headings"}}},"responseSchema":{"type":"object","title":"concord_out","required":["verdict","compliance","violations","reasons"],"properties":{"reasons":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"},"title":"Reasons","description":"concrete per-clause reasoning tying the verdict to specific clause text and specific input text, including why uncertain clauses could not be confirmed"},"verdict":{"enum":["compliant","non_compliant","partial","uncertain"],"type":"string","title":"Verdict","description":"compliant=every applicable clause is satisfied with clear support in the text; non_compliant=at least one applicable clause is clearly violated and none is left blocking-uncertain; partial=at least one applicable clause is clearly satisfied AND at least one is clearly violated; uncertain=the SAFE DEFAULT: policy or text missing/unreadable, policy too vague to apply, evidence too thin to decide, or an applicable clause cannot be confirmed met"},"compliance":{"type":"number","title":"Compliance","maximum":1,"minimum":0,"description":"calibrated probability the text fully complies with ALL applicable clauses; 1=clearly and fully complies, 0=clearly violates; stay near 0.5 when evidence is thin or the policy is ambiguous"},"violations":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"},"title":"Violations","description":"each clearly-violated applicable clause: cite the clause id/text from the POLICY, then quote the specific part of the input text that breaks it; empty list if none found"},"unverifiable_clauses":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"},"title":"Unverifiable Clauses","description":"applicable clauses that could not be judged from the inputs alone (missing context, external/current facts not supplied, or wording too ambiguous to apply)"}}},"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.06","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"registry","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.06/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.06","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.06","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_KWK5mkQFLbbN8YOrhvi_B","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.06","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":null,"unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Evaluates whether a given text complies with a specified policy, spec, or contract, returning a calibrated verdict and per-clause reasoning.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Check whether this agent response — 'We recommend buying stock XYZ immediately for guaranteed returns' — complies with our financial advice policy: 'Section 1: Agents must not make guarantees of returns. Section 2: Recommendations must include a risk disclaimer. Section 3: Agents must not use urgency language to pressure decisions.' Focus especially on Sections 1 and 2.","exampleUseCases":null,"resultDescription":"Returns a verdict enum (compliant, non_compliant, partial, or uncertain), a calibrated compliance probability (0–1), a list of specific violated clauses with quoted evidence from the input text, and per-clause reasoning tying the verdict to specific policy text. Also includes any clauses that could not be judged from the provided inputs alone.","failureModes":["Policy text too vague to apply → verdict returns 'uncertain' with compliance near 0.5","Input text missing or empty → uncertain verdict with empty violations","Policy references external facts not supplied in input → clauses listed as unverifiable","Conflicting signals across clauses → partial verdict returned","Very short or thin evidence in text → uncertain verdict to fail closed safely"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when you need a calibrated, fail-closed compliance verdict against a specific written policy, contract, or specification — especially in agentic pipelines where an incorrect 'compliant' verdict would be costly. Prefer this over generic LLM prompting when you need structured per-clause reasoning, a numeric compliance probability, and explicit tracking of unverifiable clauses. Ideal for AI governance, legal review automation, content moderation against written policies, or contract clause checking.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-14T00:50:10.464Z","isFirstParty":false}