{"uid":"cap_oE2sqpNhYUFaU-i9VJQ9L","slug":"fiatdock-token-safety-verdict-990d90fa","name":"FiatDock Token Safety Verdict","description":"Should an agent touch this token? One call: a 0-100 safety score, grade, verdict and the reasons, plus price, liquidity and pair age — for an ERC-20 on Base and six more EVM chains, or a Solana mint (send its base58 address). Rule-based, the rules published in every answer. Pay-per-call via x402. An empty body is answered for USDC on Base (the x402 settlement asset); send {\"token\":\"0x…\"} for any other token.","url":"https://fiatdock.com/v1/token/verdict?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET"],"type":"string"},"queryParams":{"type":"object","required":[],"properties":{"chain":{"enum":["base","ethereum","polygon","arbitrum","optimism","bsc","avalanche","solana"],"type":"string","example":"base","description":"Chain. Default: solana for a base58 mint, base for a 0x address"},"token":{"type":"string","example":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","maxLength":44,"description":"Token address: an ERC-20 contract (0x…) or a Solana mint (base58). Omit the whole body to get USDC on Base"}}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object"}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.009","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.009/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.009","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.009","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_YI-WVGh5AUOEcGB_D6NWm","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.009","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Returns a 0-100 safety score, letter grade, verdict, and rule-based reasoning for any ERC-20 token on Base or six other EVM chains, or a Solana mint, plus price, liquidity, and pair age data.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Is it safe to buy the token at 0x6982508145454Ce325dDbE47a25d4ec3d2311933 on Ethereum? Give me a safety score and verdict with reasons.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-trade token safety check","prompt":"Before I swap into this token on Base — 0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913 — can you pull the safety score, grade, and any red flags so I know it's not a rug?"},{"title":"Solana meme coin vetting","prompt":"Someone just sent me this Solana mint address: DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263. Run a safety verdict on it and tell me the score and liquidity before I touch it."},{"title":"Automated DeFi agent guardrail","prompt":"My trading agent is about to buy a token at 0xd9aAEc86B65D86f6A7B5B1b0c42FFA531710b6CA on Base — check the safety verdict and only proceed if the score is above 70."}],"resultDescription":"A JSON object containing a numeric safety score from 0 to 100, a letter grade, a plain-language verdict (e.g. safe / caution / avoid), a list of rule-based reasons explaining the score, plus the token's current price, liquidity depth, and trading pair age. The rules used are included in every response for transparency.","failureModes":["Unknown or unindexed token address returns an error or low-confidence result","Invalid address format (wrong chain, malformed hex, or non-base58 Solana address) returns a validation error","Token too new with insufficient liquidity data may yield limited scoring accuracy","Unsupported chain specified returns an error","Payment failure via x402 results in 402 response before scoring occurs"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when an AI agent needs a fast, rule-transparent, pay-per-call token safety check across Base, Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, BSC, Avalanche, or Solana — especially in agentic DeFi workflows where the agent must decide whether to proceed with a token interaction. Prefer it over generic on-chain data APIs when you need a pre-packaged verdict with human-readable risk reasons rather than raw contract data you'd have to analyze yourself.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-17T12:30:09.787Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"fiatdock-token-safety-verdict-990d90fa"}