{"uid":"cap_nefzeHICb-ydd0H9Tp8fb","slug":"transaction-fee-observations-record-quality-audit-numeric-distribution-7167fed4","name":"Transaction Fee Observations — Record Quality Audit + Numeric Distribution","description":"Transaction fee observations — Record quality audit + Numeric distribution: Record quality audit + Numeric distribution for supplied transaction fee observations records (fee_units, transaction_count). Up to 200 rows; 2 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 2 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-finance-03-004?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","instrument_group","date","fee_units","transaction_count"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"fee_units":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"instrument_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80},"transaction_count":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","fee_units":10,"instrument_group":"group-a","transaction_count":1},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","fee_units":20,"instrument_group":"group-b","transaction_count":2},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","fee_units":15,"instrument_group":"group-a","transaction_count":3},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","fee_units":30,"instrument_group":"group-b","transaction_count":4}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1},"field":{"enum":["fee_units","transaction_count"],"type":"string","default":"fee_units"}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_xyGgHXr0427xnsAVlWowA","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Audits data quality and computes numeric distribution statistics for transaction fee observation records (fee_units, transaction_count) — up to 200 rows, two reports per call.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a record quality audit and numeric distribution report on my transaction fee data? I have 4 rows with fee_units like 10, 20, 15, 30 for instrument groups 'group-a' and 'group-b' dated 2026-10-01 through 2026-10-04, and I want the analysis focused on the fee_units field.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-analysis fee data quality check","prompt":"Before I run my monthly fee analysis, can you audit the quality of these transaction fee records and show me the numeric distribution for fee_units? I have about 50 rows with row IDs, dates, instrument groups, fee_units, and transaction counts."},{"title":"Spot data gaps in transaction counts","prompt":"I want to validate my transaction_count field across 120 rows of fee observation data — can you run a record quality audit and numeric distribution on the transaction_count column so I can see any missing values or anomalies?"},{"title":"Distribution summary for fee reporting","prompt":"Can you profile the fee_units distribution for my dataset of 80 transaction fee rows across several instrument groups and date ranges? I need both a quality audit and a numeric distribution report to include in my report."}],"resultDescription":"Returns two analytical reports: (1) a record quality audit covering completeness, nulls, and data integrity issues for each row, and (2) a numeric distribution summary (e.g. min, max, mean, percentiles, histogram-style breakdown) for the selected numeric field (fee_units or transaction_count) — all computed locally on the supplied data with no external lookups.","failureModes":["Fewer than 1 or more than 200 rows submitted — request rejected","Invalid date format (not YYYY-MM-DD) — validation error","fee_units or transaction_count values outside ±1,000,000,000,000 range — schema rejection","Missing required fields (row_id, instrument_group, date) — row-level validation failure","Invalid field selector (not 'fee_units' or 'transaction_count') — enum validation error"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you have up to 200 rows of transaction fee observation data and need both a record-level quality audit and a numeric distribution summary in a single call for $0.01 USDC. It is ideal for pre-analysis data validation pipelines, fee data ingestion checks, or lightweight statistical profiling without requiring any external data sources or live lookups.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-28T06:47:04.642Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"transaction-fee-observations-record-quality-audit-numeric-distribution-7167fed4"}