{"uid":"cap_nC5Xu5ocp-xIrAhcXLPQT","slug":"superchain-tokenomics-review-ac162c3b","name":"SuperChain Tokenomics Review","description":"Onchain intelligence. Tokenomics, transactions and governance, decoded.","url":"https://superchain.supercapital.fun/tokenomics-review?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"input":{"type":"string","maxLength":8000,"minLength":1,"description":"Paste the token’s docs or describe supply, allocations, vesting and fee flows."}}},"responseSchema":{"type":"json","example":{"jobId":"j_…","output":"…","receipt":{"tx":"0x…","amount":"100000","network":"base"}}},"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.3","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.3/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.3","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.3","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_E01RNPmImSE1xceBJbHDd","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.3","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Analyzes token economics documentation to decode supply schedules, allocation structures, vesting timelines, and fee flows using onchain intelligence","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you review the tokenomics for this project and break down how the supply is distributed, when tokens vest, and how fee flows work? Here are the docs: 'Total supply 1B tokens. Team allocation 20% with 4-year vesting and 1-year cliff. Community treasury 30%, released linearly over 3 years. Protocol fees split 50% to stakers, 50% burned.'","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-investment tokenomics due diligence","prompt":"I'm considering investing in a new DeFi protocol — can you analyze these tokenomics docs and flag any red flags around team allocation, vesting cliffs, or inflation? Here's their whitepaper section: 'Supply 500M, founders get 35% vesting over 2 years with no cliff, ecosystem fund 25%, public sale 10%.'"},{"title":"Comparing token unlock sell pressure","prompt":"I need to understand the sell pressure risk of this token's vesting schedule. Can you decode this and tell me when major unlock events happen and how much supply hits the market? Docs: '200M tokens locked, advisors 5% unlock monthly starting month 6, investors 15% unlock at TGE then linear over 18 months.'"},{"title":"Evaluating governance token fee distribution","prompt":"Can you review how fee flows work in this governance token design and tell me whether token holders are actually incentivized to participate? Here's the description: 'Protocol generates 0.3% swap fees, 60% distributed to veToken holders weekly, 20% to treasury, 20% to liquidity providers.'"}],"resultDescription":"Returns a structured JSON object containing a jobId, a detailed textual analysis output covering tokenomics health, supply mechanics, allocation breakdown, vesting timeline assessment, and fee flow interpretation, along with a payment receipt including transaction hash, amount paid, and network used.","failureModes":["Empty or too-short input text (below minLength of 1 character) returns a validation error","Input exceeding 8000 characters is rejected with a schema validation error","Vague or non-tokenomics input may result in a low-quality or off-topic analysis output","Payment failure or insufficient USDC balance prevents the call from completing","Network congestion on Base may delay receipt confirmation"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need rapid, structured analysis of a token's economic design from raw documentation or descriptions — especially when evaluating supply schedules, vesting cliffs, allocation fairness, or fee distribution mechanics. It is well-suited for investment due diligence, competitive token comparison, or governance research where you have textual documentation to submit. Prefer it over general-purpose LLMs when you want a specialized onchain intelligence perspective with a payment-auditable receipt.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-21T07:19:09.878Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"superchain-tokenomics-review-ac162c3b"}