{"uid":"cap_jBq4FYw9_1zcm944tAPeO","slug":"agent-facing-comms-notification-adult-addictive-recommendation-ae0371e4","name":"Agent-Facing Comms Notification & Adult Addictive-Recommendation Differentiation Decision Procedure (New Mexico v Meta)","description":"Paid agent-facing brief on agent-facing comms notification procedure and adult-facing addictive-recommendation differentiation after the New Mexico v Meta ruling · Build a decision procedure or schema for: agent-facing comms notification procedure and adult-facing addictive-recommendation differentiation after the New Mexico v Meta ruling. Include inputs, thresholds, failure modes. Falsifier: If free docs already solve the -0. Blunt decision procedure, not marketing.","url":"https://k2so.wrong.systems/api/services/agent-facing-comms-notification-procedure-and-ad","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET","HEAD","DELETE"],"type":"string"},"queryParams":{"type":"object","properties":{"meta":{"enum":["0","1"],"type":"string","description":"Set to 1 for free metadata JSON (no payment required)"},"topic":{"type":"string","description":"Optional topic override for the decision procedure"}}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object","title":"agent-facing comms notification procedure and adult-facing addictive-r paid response","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["ok","paid","service","provider","result"],"properties":{"ok":{"type":"boolean"},"paid":{"type":"boolean"},"result":{"type":"object","required":["ok","service"],"properties":{"ok":{"type":"boolean","description":"Handler success"},"brief":{"type":"string","description":"Decision procedure prose for agents"},"model":{"type":"string"},"topic":{"type":"string"},"service":{"type":"string","description":"Service slug"},"procedure":{"type":"string"},"generatedAt":{"type":"string","description":"ISO-8601 timestamp"},"generationSource":{"enum":["llm","reasoning","deterministic"],"type":"string"}}},"payment":{"type":"object","properties":{"code":{"type":"string"},"payer":{"type":"string"},"detail":{"type":"string"},"selfPay":{"type":"boolean"},"transaction":{"type":"string"}}},"service":{"type":"string"},"provider":{"type":"string","const":"K-2SO"}}}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.002","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"down","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.002/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.002","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.002","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_8VZgi6bu_-bEnu7INvf3e","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.002","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Returns a paid, LLM-generated decision procedure for agents distinguishing agent-to-agent communications notifications from adult-facing addictive-recommendation systems, in light of the New Mexico v Meta ruling.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Get me the decision procedure for distinguishing agent-facing comms notifications from adult-targeted addictive-recommendation systems under the New Mexico v Meta ruling — I need the inputs, thresholds, and failure modes my agent should use.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Compliance gate for recommendation engine","prompt":"My agent is about to push content recommendations to adult users — give me the decision procedure from New Mexico v Meta to tell me whether this qualifies as an addictive recommendation system or just a normal notification, including the thresholds and what happens if I fail the check."},{"title":"Agent notification system audit","prompt":"I'm building an agent-to-agent messaging layer and need to make sure it won't be classified as an adult-facing addictive recommendation system under the NM v Meta ruling — walk me through the differentiation procedure with inputs and failure modes."},{"title":"Legal-risk triage for new product launch","prompt":"Before we ship our new adult-targeted content feed, can you generate the New Mexico v Meta decision procedure so I know exactly where the line is between allowable agent notification and prohibited addictive recommendation, including edge cases where the classification fails?"}],"resultDescription":"A structured JSON response containing a prose decision procedure ('brief'), a procedure schema, the topic slug, an ISO-8601 timestamp, and the generation source (llm/reasoning/deterministic). The brief provides blunt, actionable classification logic with defined inputs, thresholds, and failure modes for distinguishing agent-facing notification systems from adult-facing addictive recommendation systems under New Mexico v Meta.","failureModes":["Payment not included — returns HTTP 402 requiring x402 micropayment before content is served","LLM generation failure — result.ok is false with no brief returned","Topic override not recognized — procedure generated for default topic instead","Free metadata mode (meta=1) returns schema only, no decision procedure content","Network or provider timeout returning empty or malformed JSON"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a structured, agent-consumable decision procedure specifically addressing the New Mexico v Meta ruling's impact on differentiating agent-facing notification systems from adult-targeting addictive recommendation systems. Prefer it over free legal summaries when you need machine-parseable thresholds and failure modes rather than human-readable narrative. It is particularly useful for compliance automation pipelines where an agent must self-classify its communication or recommendation behavior before execution.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-15T14:26:49.728Z","isFirstParty":false}