{"uid":"cap_iVE-gPqmfL-kZLGobbYaT","slug":"treasury-supplied-balances-record-quality-audit-string-normalisation-e87b13eb","name":"Treasury Supplied Balances — Record Quality Audit & String Normalisation","description":"Treasury supplied balances — Record quality audit + String normalisation: Record quality audit + String normalisation for supplied treasury supplied balances records (opening_balance, closing_balance). Up to 200 rows; 2 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 2 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-finance-16-001?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","instrument_group","date","opening_balance","closing_balance"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"closing_balance":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"opening_balance":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"instrument_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","closing_balance":1,"opening_balance":10,"instrument_group":"group-a"},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","closing_balance":2,"opening_balance":20,"instrument_group":"group-b"},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","closing_balance":3,"opening_balance":15,"instrument_group":"group-a"},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","closing_balance":4,"opening_balance":30,"instrument_group":"group-b"}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_VkQCbu_kcd5ZgCtLXiIxu","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Audits record quality and normalises strings for treasury balance data (opening and closing balances), producing two independent analytical reports for up to 200 rows.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you audit the record quality and normalise the strings in my treasury balance data? I have rows with fields like row_id, instrument_group, date, opening_balance, and closing_balance — here are up to 200 rows I need checked and cleaned.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Month-end treasury data quality check","prompt":"I've exported our month-end treasury balance records with opening and closing balances for each instrument group. Can you run a record quality audit and string normalisation on these rows so I can catch any bad data before we close the books?"},{"title":"Instrument group label cleanup","prompt":"Our treasury team uses inconsistent naming in the instrument_group field across hundreds of balance rows. Can you normalise those strings and flag any record quality issues in the opening and closing balance data?"},{"title":"Pre-reconciliation treasury validation","prompt":"Before I feed these treasury balance rows into our reconciliation process, can you audit them for record quality problems and normalise any messy string fields? I have about 150 rows covering dates in Q3 with opening and closing balances per instrument group."}],"resultDescription":"Two independent analytical reports: one covering record quality audit findings (e.g. missing values, out-of-range balances, malformed dates) and one covering string normalisation results for text fields such as instrument_group. Results are computed locally with no external lookups or predictions.","failureModes":["Exceeding 200 rows returns a validation error","Rows missing required fields (row_id, instrument_group, date, opening_balance, closing_balance) will be rejected","Dates not matching YYYY-MM-DD format will fail schema validation","Balance values outside ±1,000,000,000,000 will be rejected","Empty rows array returns an error","Payment failure via x402 prevents endpoint access"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a combined record quality audit and string normalisation pass specifically on treasury opening/closing balance data, and want two independent reports in a single low-cost call ($0.01 USDC for up to 200 rows). Prefer this over generic data quality tools when your data matches the treasury balance schema (instrument_group, opening_balance, closing_balance by date), and when you do not need live market data, external lookups, or predictive analytics.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-27T13:06:37.140Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"treasury-supplied-balances-record-quality-audit-string-normalisation-e87b13eb"}