{"uid":"cap_fz5KQPEVdo5D0EVX5XVYv","slug":"tradepilotusa-executive-brief-generator-b26791d5","name":"TradepilotUSA Executive Brief Generator","description":"Condense supplied material into decision-relevant findings, evidence, risks, and required actions. Uses buyer-supplied information only; no external research or outbound actions. Returns a draft for human review.","url":"https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/executive_brief/execute?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"brief":{"type":"string","maxLength":12000,"minLength":10},"audience":{"type":"string","maxLength":500},"source_text":{"type":"string","maxLength":32000,"minLength":20}}},"responseSchema":{"type":"json","example":{"task":"executive_brief","summary":"Example Door Company aims to improve scheduling over six weeks and has two vendor proposals differing in scope and price. However, critical data such as current booking volume, customer feedback, vend","artifact":"Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Decision-Relevant Findings\n\n- Example Door Company currently installs residential entry doors in Dallas using a two-person crew.\n- Consultations are conducted on weekdays.\n- The project aims to improve scheduling over a six-week period.\n- Vendor A offers a process assessment for $500.\n- Vendor B offers a process assessment plus a staff workshop for $800.\n- Evaluation criteria include implementation effort, scope clarity, and staff training.\n\n## Evidence\n\n- Pricing proposals: Vendor A ($500), ","provenance":{"source":"buyer_supplied","generated_at":"2026-09-22T14:41:54.388Z","external_research_performed":false},"request_id":"example_executive_brief","assumptions":["Pricing figures are fictional and not market-validated.","Scheduling improvement is the primary project goal."],"evidence_gaps":["Current booking volume and scheduling performance metrics.","Customer feedback related to scheduling."],"requires_human_review":true}},"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.25","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.25/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.25","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.25","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_1qnZI8VY64O5rSdsRsNWr","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.25","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Generates a structured executive brief with decision-relevant findings, evidence gaps, and assumptions from a supplied source text and audience context","exampleAgentPrompt":"I have two vendor proposals for our new scheduling system — can you generate an executive brief from these documents for our VP of Operations, highlighting decision-relevant findings, evidence gaps, and key assumptions?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Vendor comparison brief for leadership","prompt":"I have two competing vendor proposals for our IT infrastructure upgrade — one for $50K and one for $80K with extra training included. Can you generate an executive brief summarizing the key findings, evidence gaps, and assumptions for our CTO so she can make a decision?"},{"title":"Contract review summary for legal team","prompt":"Here's a 20-page service agreement from a new supplier. Can you produce an executive brief of the most decision-relevant points, flag any evidence gaps, and note any assumptions baked in — the audience is our legal and procurement team?"},{"title":"Post-meeting briefing from raw notes","prompt":"I have raw notes from our quarterly business review meeting covering sales pipeline, headcount, and budget. Can you turn these into a structured executive brief with key findings and evidence gaps for the executive team?"}],"resultDescription":"Returns a JSON object containing a plain-language summary, a detailed artifact with decision-relevant findings and evidence sections formatted in Markdown, a provenance block indicating data source and generation timestamp, a list of assumptions made, a list of evidence gaps identified, a request ID, and a flag indicating whether human review is required.","failureModes":["Source text too short (minLength 20 not met) — validation error","Source text exceeds 32,000 character limit — truncation or rejection","Brief instructions exceed 12,000 character limit — validation error","Insufficient context in source text to produce meaningful findings — low-confidence output with many evidence gaps","Malformed JSON request body — 400 error","Payment not completed via x402 — 402 Payment Required"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a structured, decision-ready executive brief generated from raw text input — especially for vendor proposals, business reports, meeting notes, or contracts — and require explicit provenance tracking, assumption logging, and evidence gap identification. Prefer it over general summarization tools when the output needs to be formatted for executive or C-suite audiences with clear decision-support structure.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-02T06:48:37.149Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"tradepilotusa-executive-brief-generator-b26791d5"}