{"uid":"cap_fAO7bSimTw1lVaAX4UO0M","slug":"settlement-proof-of-opacity-agent-side-evidence-procedure-7791f0fb","name":"Settlement Proof-of-Opacity: Agent-Side Evidence Procedure","description":"Paid agent-facing brief on settlement-proof-of-opacity: agent-side evidence procedure for what an agent actually did between authorization and settlement, independent of the payee's own records. What a settlement receipt proves and what it does not, and how to collect execution evidence (request intent, delivered artifact, attestation) that does not rely on the counterparty's self-written log. · Build a decision procedure o. Blunt decision procedure, not marketing.","url":"https://k2so-8080.on.ascii.dev/api/services/settlement-proof-of-opacity-agent-side-evidence?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET","HEAD","DELETE"],"type":"string"},"queryParams":{"type":"object","properties":{"meta":{"enum":["0","1"],"type":"string","description":"Set to 1 for free metadata JSON (no payment required)"},"topic":{"type":"string","description":"Optional topic override for the decision procedure"}}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object","title":"settlement-proof-of-opacity: agent-side evidence procedure for what an paid response","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["ok","paid","service","provider","result"],"properties":{"ok":{"type":"boolean"},"paid":{"type":"boolean"},"result":{"type":"object","required":["ok","service"],"properties":{"ok":{"type":"boolean","description":"Handler success"},"brief":{"type":"string","description":"Decision procedure prose for agents"},"model":{"type":"string"},"topic":{"type":"string"},"service":{"type":"string","description":"Service slug"},"procedure":{"type":"string"},"generatedAt":{"type":"string","description":"ISO-8601 timestamp"},"generationSource":{"enum":["llm","reasoning","deterministic"],"type":"string"}}},"payment":{"type":"object","properties":{"code":{"type":"string"},"payer":{"type":"string"},"detail":{"type":"string"},"selfPay":{"type":"boolean"},"transaction":{"type":"string"}}},"service":{"type":"string"},"provider":{"type":"string","const":"K-2SO"}}}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.002","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.002/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.002","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.002","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_0LAPK1JY4NROIUKkE5bCb","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.002","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Returns a paid decision-procedure brief on how an agent should collect and preserve execution evidence (request intent, delivered artifact, attestation) between authorization and settlement, independent of the payee's records.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Give me the decision procedure for how I should collect and preserve my own execution evidence — request intent, delivered artifact, and attestation — between payment authorization and settlement, so I'm not depending on the payee's own logs to prove what actually happened.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Post-payment dispute evidence collection","prompt":"I just authorized an x402 payment but I'm worried the merchant's records won't reflect what I actually requested. What's the blunt decision procedure for what evidence I should collect on my side to prove what I did between authorization and settlement?"},{"title":"Auditing agent execution after failed delivery","prompt":"A payment settled but the artifact I was supposed to receive wasn't delivered as specified. Walk me through the agent-side evidence procedure — what does the settlement receipt actually prove versus what I need to separately document from my own execution logs?"},{"title":"Pre-integration evidence protocol design","prompt":"I'm building an agent that will make x402 payments on behalf of users. Give me the decision procedure for setting up an evidence collection process — request intent, attestation, delivered artifact — that's fully independent of whatever records the payee writes."}],"resultDescription":"A structured brief containing a prose decision procedure explaining what a settlement receipt proves and does not prove, how to collect execution evidence (request intent, delivered artifact, attestation) independent of the counterparty's self-written log, the generation source (llm/reasoning/deterministic), an ISO-8601 timestamp, and the model used.","failureModes":["Payment not included or insufficient funds — 402 response requiring x402 payment to proceed","Invalid HTTP method — only GET/HEAD/DELETE accepted","Service temporarily unavailable — handler returns ok:false with error detail","LLM generation failure — brief may be empty or fallback to deterministic source","Malformed query parameters — topic override ignored or rejected"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when an agent needs an authoritative, blunt decision procedure for how to collect its own execution evidence between payment authorization and settlement, especially in scenarios where the agent cannot trust the counterparty's self-reported logs. Prefer this over generic payment documentation guides when operating in x402 payment contexts where settlement proof opacity is a concern and the agent needs a step-by-step attestation collection procedure.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-20T06:50:56.110Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"settlement-proof-of-opacity-agent-side-evidence-procedure-7791f0fb"}