{"uid":"cap_cst2hBLg7sY_eArh_xojl","slug":"ai-agent-tool-call-reliability-analyzer-19a60545","name":"AI Agent Tool Call Reliability Analyzer","description":"Analyzes a single AI agent tool call and returns a structured reliability report. Detects failure modes including sycophantic gap-filling, context degradation, hallucination, repetition loops, confidence collapse, and schema violations, with remediation suggestions for each.","url":"https://app-443.hdgregory.com/run","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"call_id":{"type":"string","description":"Optional identifier for this call"},"response":{"description":"The tool's raw response (any JSON-serializable value)"},"tool_name":{"type":"string","description":"Name of the tool that was called"},"latency_ms":{"type":"number","description":"Call latency in milliseconds"},"parameters":{"type":"object","description":"Parameters the tool was called with"},"token_count":{"type":"integer","description":"Optional token count for the response"},"expected_schema":{"type":"object","description":"Optional JSON Schema the response is expected to match"},"confidence_score":{"type":"number","description":"Optional model-reported confidence, 0.0-1.0"},"context_window_used":{"type":"number","description":"Optional context window utilization, 0.0-1.0"}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_XA-4qlB79k78XRQt-99AR","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Analyzes a single AI agent tool call and returns a structured reliability report detecting failure modes like hallucination, sycophancy, and schema violations","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you analyze this tool call to my 'search_web' tool — it was called with query='best restaurants NYC', returned a long unstructured blob, took 2400ms, and the model reported 0.6 confidence — I want to know if it hallucinated, gap-filled, or violated schema, and what I should do about it.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Hallucination detection in production agent","prompt":"My agent called the 'get_stock_price' tool with ticker='AAPL' and got back a number, but I'm not sure if it just made it up — can you run a reliability check on the response with latency 340ms and confidence score 0.45 and tell me if it hallucinated?"},{"title":"Schema violation audit for tool output","prompt":"I have an expected JSON schema for my 'user_profile' tool and the response I got back doesn't look right — can you check the tool call for schema violations, the tool was called with user_id='u_123', response was missing required fields, latency was 800ms?"},{"title":"Sycophancy and gap-filling diagnosis","prompt":"My agent's 'answer_question' tool keeps agreeing with everything the user says and filling in gaps with made-up details — can you analyze a specific call where it was given an ambiguous question and returned an overly confident answer with context window at 0.92 utilization?"}],"resultDescription":"A structured reliability report with a status field (pass/warn/fail/critical), a metrics object, an array of detected failures (e.g. hallucination, sycophantic gap-filling, schema violations, repetition loops, confidence collapse, context degradation), and an array of string remediation recommendations.","failureModes":["Invalid or missing required fields (tool_name, parameters, response, latency_ms) returns an error","Malformed JSON body causes a parse error","Non-JSON-serializable response value in the body field causes rejection","Payment not included or insufficient (x402 protocol) results in 402 Payment Required","Network timeout for slow tool calls with very large response payloads","Service unavailable returns an error with null result"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when you need per-call, real-time reliability analysis of individual AI agent tool calls — especially when you need to detect nuanced LLM-specific failure modes like sycophantic gap-filling, context degradation, and confidence collapse that generic schema validators cannot catch. Prefer this over simple JSON validators when you need actionable remediation suggestions tied to specific failure modes, or when monitoring agent reliability in production at a per-call granularity.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-14T12:39:04.091Z","isFirstParty":false}