{"uid":"cap_bjZUVcj1_Vxv4_W7ytDzn","slug":"pre-settlement-contract-term-vetting-decision-procedure-2129e994","name":"Pre-Settlement Contract Term Vetting Decision Procedure","description":"Deterministic decision procedure for an agent about to settle a service contract: detect subjective or ambiguous acceptance language (as agreed, satisfactory, best effort, complete) before approving final payment. Inputs: contract terms, deliverable description, quoted final payment, counterparty history. Checks: flag every subjective acceptance phrase, require an objective, verifiable acceptance test per deliverable, bind the payment trigger to a passing test rather than an invoice or elapsed","url":"https://k2so-8080.on.ascii.dev/api/services/agent-facing-pre-settlement-contract-term-vettin?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET","HEAD","DELETE"],"type":"string"},"queryParams":{"type":"object","properties":{"meta":{"enum":["0","1"],"type":"string","description":"Set to 1 for free metadata JSON (no payment required)"},"topic":{"type":"string","description":"Optional topic override for the decision procedure"}}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object","title":"Pre-settlement contract term vetting decision procedure paid response","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["ok","paid","service","provider","result"],"properties":{"ok":{"type":"boolean"},"paid":{"type":"boolean"},"result":{"type":"object","required":["ok","service"],"properties":{"ok":{"type":"boolean","description":"Handler success"},"brief":{"type":"string","description":"Decision procedure prose for agents"},"model":{"type":"string"},"topic":{"type":"string"},"service":{"type":"string","description":"Service slug"},"procedure":{"type":"string"},"generatedAt":{"type":"string","description":"ISO-8601 timestamp"},"generationSource":{"enum":["llm","reasoning","deterministic"],"type":"string"}}},"payment":{"type":"object","properties":{"code":{"type":"string"},"payer":{"type":"string"},"detail":{"type":"string"},"selfPay":{"type":"boolean"},"transaction":{"type":"string"}}},"service":{"type":"string"},"provider":{"type":"string","const":"K-2SO"}}}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.002","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.002/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.002","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.002","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_FscIWM3f7A1DCRlCbXjXL","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.002","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Analyzes service contract terms to flag subjective or ambiguous acceptance language and enforce objective, verifiable payment triggers before an agent approves final settlement.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Before I approve the final $2,400 payment to this contractor, can you vet these contract terms and flag any vague acceptance language like 'satisfactory' or 'best effort' — and tell me if the payment trigger is tied to a real verifiable test rather than just their invoice?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Freelance deliverable payment safety check","prompt":"I'm about to release $1,800 to a freelance developer for a completed API integration. Can you review these contract terms and flag any subjective acceptance phrases, and confirm the payment is tied to a passing integration test rather than just their final invoice?"},{"title":"Agency retainer settlement vetting","prompt":"Before my agent auto-approves the end-of-month retainer payment to our design agency, vet these contract terms for language like 'as agreed' or 'complete' that could be disputed — I need objective acceptance criteria for every deliverable."},{"title":"SaaS vendor milestone payment review","prompt":"We're settling a $5,000 milestone payment for a SaaS vendor. Check their contract terms for any ambiguous completion language and tell me whether the payment trigger is bound to a verifiable acceptance test or just an elapsed date."}],"resultDescription":"A structured vetting result containing: flagged subjective or ambiguous acceptance phrases found in the contract, a recommendation to require objective and verifiable acceptance tests per deliverable, guidance on binding the payment trigger to a passing test rather than an invoice or date, and a decision procedure prose summary for the agent. Includes metadata such as model used, generation source, and ISO-8601 timestamp.","failureModes":["Missing or malformed contract terms input may result in incomplete vetting with partial flags only","Ambiguous deliverable descriptions may reduce the accuracy of acceptance test recommendations","Service may return a generic decision procedure if topic override is not specified","Payment required (x402) before substantive result is returned; unpaid calls return metadata only","Counterparty history not provided may limit risk-based contextualization of flags"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when an AI agent is about to approve a final settlement payment and needs a deterministic, structured review of contract language for subjective or unverifiable acceptance criteria. Prefer this over general-purpose contract review LLMs when you need a consistent, repeatable decision procedure specifically designed for agentic x402 payment workflows, where binding payment to objective tests (not invoices or elapsed time) is the primary safety concern.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-20T18:50:43.902Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"pre-settlement-contract-term-vetting-decision-procedure-2129e994"}