{"uid":"cap_aQwAAkA0F7f_J8d8j2juk","slug":"legal-memoryapi-org-09d89fd6","name":"Legal Memory API - Case Detail Lookup","description":"Federal court opinion search via CourtListener. Search 10M+ opinions, docket records, and case history. Pay-per-request via x402 protocol on Base mainnet.","url":"https://legal.memoryapi.org/x402/legal/case","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"properties":{"input":{"required":["method"],"properties":{"method":{"enum":["GET"],"type":"string"}}}}},"responseSchema":{"example":{"cause":null,"court":"scotus","parties":null,"success":true,"case_name":"Roe v. Wade","date_filed":"1970-01-01","docket_number":"70-18","nature_of_suit":null,"opinions_count":3}},"example":{"request":{"method":"GET"},"response":{"cases":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4487344/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"Supreme Court of the United States","citation":"584 U.S. 236, 138 S. Ct. 1186, 200 L. Ed. 2d 610, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2495","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"2018-04-17","docket_number":"17-2"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7317711/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, W.D. Washington","citation":"154 F. Supp. 3d 1134","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"2015-11-20","docket_number":"Case No. C15-00102RSM, Case No. C15-00103RSM"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2503780/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, District of Columbia","citation":"215 F. Supp. 2d 1, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13863, 2002 WL 1676762","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"2002-07-01","docket_number":"CIV.A.98-1232(CKK)"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2452490/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, District of Columbia","citation":"231 F. Supp. 2d 144, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21098, 2002 WL 31439450","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"2002-11-01","docket_number":"CIV.A.98-1232(CKK)"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2307082/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, District of Columbia","citation":"87 F. Supp. 2d 30, 54 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1365, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3575, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4014, 2000 WL 340768","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"2000-04-03","docket_number":"Civil Action 98-1232 (TPJ), 98-1233 (TPJ)"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/768835/united-states-v-microsoft-corporation/","court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","citation":"213 F.3d 764, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19134, 2000 WL 763598","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corporation","date_filed":"2000-06-13","docket_number":"00-5212"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/185418/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","citation":"253 F.3d 34, 346 U.S. App. D.C. 330, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14324, 2001 WL 721343","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"2001-06-28","docket_number":"No. 00-5212 consolidated with 00-5213"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/184738/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","citation":"165 F.3d 952, 334 U.S. App. D.C. 165, 42 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1076, 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1300, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161, 1999 WL 34827","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"1999-01-29","docket_number":"17-1181"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2497700/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, District of Columbia","citation":"84 F. Supp. 2d 9, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21782, 1999 WL 1456114","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"1999-11-05","docket_number":"CIV. A. 98-1232(TPJ), CIV. A. 98-1233(TPJ)"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2339529/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, District of Columbia","citation":"97 F. Supp. 2d 59, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7582, 2000 WL 726757","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"2000-06-07","docket_number":"CIV. A. 98-1232(TPJ), CIV. A. 98-1233(TPJ)"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2425425/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, District of Columbia","citation":"65 F. Supp. 2d 1, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17110, 1999 WL 1001107","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"1999-11-05","docket_number":"CIV. A. 98-1232(TPJ), CIV. A. 98-1233(TPJ)"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/184611/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","citation":"147 F.3d 935","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp","date_filed":"1998-07-17","docket_number":"97-5343"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1883068/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, District of Columbia","citation":"980 F. Supp. 537, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19496, 1997 WL 764994","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"1997-12-11","docket_number":"CIV.A. 94-1564 TPJ"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/184556/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","citation":"147 F.3d 935, 331 U.S. App. D.C. 121, 41 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 216, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13242","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"1998-06-23","docket_number":"97-5343 and 98-5012"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/184610/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","citation":"147 F.3d 935","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp","date_filed":"1998-07-17","docket_number":"97-5343"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9046386/united-states-v-microsoft-corp/","court":"District Court, District of Columbia","citation":"159 F.R.D. 318, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1654, 1995 WL 59480","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corp.","date_filed":"1995-02-14","docket_number":"Civ. A. No. 94-1564"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4340638/microsoft-corp-v-united-states/","court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","citation":"","case_name":"Microsoft Corp. v. United States","date_filed":"2017-01-24","docket_number":"14-2985"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8443266/microsoft-corp-v-united-states/","court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","citation":"855 F.3d 53, 2017 WL 362765, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1274","case_name":"Microsoft Corp. v. United States","date_filed":"2017-01-24","docket_number":"14-2985"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4238423/microsoft-corp-v-united-states/","court":"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","citation":"829 F.3d 197, 2016 WL 3770056","case_name":"Microsoft Corp. v. United States","date_filed":"2016-07-14","docket_number":"Docket 14-2985"},{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/697616/united-states-v-microsoft-corporation-united-states-of-america-v/","court":"Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","citation":"56 F.3d 1448, 312 U.S. App. D.C. 378, 1995 WL 357850","case_name":"United States v. Microsoft Corporation. United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation","date_filed":"1995-08-17","docket_number":"95-5037, 95-5039"}],"count":20,"query":"United States v. Microsoft","source":"CourtListener / RECAP Archive","success":true,"disclaimer":"Public court records. Verify at courtlistener.com.","total_available":8896}},"exampleRequest":{"method":"GET"},"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"settled","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"down","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_byL4meYM36-UTLhxeCfC4","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Retrieve detailed information about a specific federal court case or docket by its ID or name.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you pull up the full case details for the federal lawsuit Goldman Sachs v. SEC, docket number 1:23-cv-09170, from the Southern District of New York?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Verify defendant identity in litigation","prompt":"I need to confirm who exactly was sued in case 2:20-cv-45832 filed in the Eastern District of Texas. Can you pull up the full docket to see all parties involved?"},{"title":"Track motion and hearing deadlines","prompt":"What's the current status of Smith v. Johnson, case number 1:22-cv-78901 in the Northern District of California? I need to know what filings are pending and what the next deadlines are."},{"title":"Assess competitor legal exposure","prompt":"Can you look up docket information for the case TechCorp Inc. v. DataSystems LLC, docket 3:21-cv-54321 from the Central District of Illinois? I want to see the full case timeline and what claims were filed."}],"resultDescription":"Returns detailed information about the specified court case, including docket number, case name, parties involved, court jurisdiction, case status, filing dates, and related docket entries from the federal court record.","failureModes":["Case ID or name not found — returns 404 or empty result","Ambiguous case name matches multiple records — may return unexpected case","Case exists in state court (not federal) — not covered by this endpoint","Payment failure (x402 protocol) — call blocked if USDC payment not processed","Invalid docket format — malformed ID returns error"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when you already know a specific case ID, docket number, or precise case name and need full details about that single case. Prefer this over the search/company-lookup sibling endpoints when you have a specific identifier rather than needing to discover cases. Best for retrieving structured docket metadata for a known federal proceeding.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-15T14:28:22.708Z","isFirstParty":false}