{"uid":"cap__pjRgEztp-cbfWDBe-Cxw","slug":"proposal-preparation-data-quality-correlation-analysis-2c2b2f4d","name":"Proposal Preparation Data Quality & Correlation Analysis","description":"Proposal preparation — Record quality audit + String normalisation + Two-measure correlation: Record quality audit + String normalisation + Two-measure correlation for supplied proposal preparation records (completed_sections, planned_sections). Up to 200 rows; 3 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 3 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-writing-08-204?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","document_group","date","completed_sections","planned_sections"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"document_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80},"planned_sections":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"completed_sections":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","document_group":"group-a","planned_sections":1,"completed_sections":10},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","document_group":"group-b","planned_sections":2,"completed_sections":20},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","document_group":"group-a","planned_sections":3,"completed_sections":15},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","document_group":"group-b","planned_sections":4,"completed_sections":30}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_Nv6EKHa9o2yMTNywol0JI","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Runs three independent analytical reports on proposal preparation records: a record quality audit, string normalisation, and two-measure correlation between completed_sections and planned_sections.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you audit the quality of my proposal preparation data, normalise the strings, and check the correlation between planned and completed sections? I have rows for document groups like 'group-a' and 'group-b' with dates in October 2026 and section counts — up to 50 rows total.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-submission proposal data audit","prompt":"Before we submit the quarterly grant proposals, can you run a quality audit and string normalisation on our proposal tracking records? We have about 80 rows with document groups, dates from 2025-01-01 to 2025-03-31, and counts of planned vs completed sections."},{"title":"Correlation check on proposal progress","prompt":"I want to know how closely our planned section targets track against actual completed sections across our proposal pipeline — can you run a two-measure correlation on these 120 rows of proposal data with document groups and dates?"},{"title":"Data cleanliness check before reporting","prompt":"We're pulling together a proposal status report and I need to make sure the underlying data is clean first — can you do a record quality audit and string normalisation on these 45 proposal records covering groups alpha, beta, and gamma with dates in 2024?"}],"resultDescription":"Three independent analytical reports: (1) a record quality audit highlighting missing values, type issues, and anomalies across all rows; (2) a string normalisation report standardising document_group and other string fields; (3) a two-measure correlation report quantifying the statistical relationship between completed_sections and planned_sections across the supplied rows. All reports are generated from the supplied data only — no external lookups or predictions.","failureModes":["Submitting more than 200 rows returns a validation error","Missing required fields (row_id, date, completed_sections, planned_sections) cause rejection","Dates not matching YYYY-MM-DD pattern fail schema validation","Null values in both numeric fields across all rows may produce degenerate correlation results","Empty rows array (minItems:1 not met) returns a schema error"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a combined quality audit, string normalisation, and correlation analysis on proposal preparation records (with completed_sections and planned_sections fields) in a single call at low cost ($0.01 USDC). It is ideal for pre-reporting data hygiene checks on batches of up to 200 proposal rows. Prefer it over general-purpose analytics tools when your data conforms to the proposal preparation schema and you want three bundled reports without external data dependencies.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-26T12:31:21.359Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"proposal-preparation-data-quality-correlation-analysis-2c2b2f4d"}