{"uid":"cap__2wRS3UcEBHGuNmNHKddW","slug":"document-redaction-review-record-quality-audit-string-normalisation-6be211d1","name":"Document Redaction Review — Record Quality Audit & String Normalisation","description":"Document redaction review — Record quality audit + String normalisation: Record quality audit + String normalisation for supplied document redaction review records (flagged_spans, reviewed_spans). Up to 200 rows; 2 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 2 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-writing-14-001?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","document_group","date","flagged_spans","reviewed_spans"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"flagged_spans":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"document_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80},"reviewed_spans":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","flagged_spans":10,"document_group":"group-a","reviewed_spans":1},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","flagged_spans":20,"document_group":"group-b","reviewed_spans":2},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","flagged_spans":15,"document_group":"group-a","reviewed_spans":3},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","flagged_spans":30,"document_group":"group-b","reviewed_spans":4}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_OW0rz0tqq1b0obdoUoGT1","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Runs two local analytical reports (record quality audit and string normalisation) on up to 200 rows of document redaction review data containing flagged and reviewed span counts.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a record quality audit and string normalisation on my redaction review data? I have rows for document groups 'legal-contracts' and 'hr-files' from 2025-06-01 to 2025-06-04, with flagged_spans counts like 10, 25, 8, 40 and reviewed_spans like 2, 5, 1, 9.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Compliance redaction data QA","prompt":"I need to audit the quality of our redaction review records for last quarter — can you check for missing values, bad string formats, and normalise the document_group labels across these 50 rows of flagged_spans and reviewed_spans data?"},{"title":"Automated redaction pipeline validation","prompt":"Before we archive this batch, run a record quality audit and string normalisation on these 120 redaction review rows from document groups 'finance-q2' and 'legal-q2' dated between 2025-04-01 and 2025-06-30 to make sure the data is clean."},{"title":"Cross-team redaction review reconciliation","prompt":"We have two teams submitting redaction review records with inconsistent string formats in the document_group field — can you normalise those strings and flag any quality issues across all 80 rows so I can reconcile them?"}],"resultDescription":"Two independent analytical reports: (1) a record quality audit covering completeness, consistency, and validity of the supplied rows; and (2) a string normalisation report covering standardised or flagged string fields — both produced locally from the supplied data with no external lookups or predictions.","failureModes":["More than 200 rows submitted — request rejected due to maxItems constraint","Missing required fields (row_id, document_group, date, flagged_spans, reviewed_spans) cause validation errors","Date strings not matching YYYY-MM-DD pattern are rejected","row_id exceeding 80 characters or empty string fails schema validation","Numeric span values outside allowed range (-1e12 to 1e12) are rejected"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a fast, low-cost ($0.01 USDC) dual-report quality check on document redaction review records — specifically for auditing record completeness and normalising string fields in batches of up to 200 rows, without requiring any live data lookups, ML predictions, or external professional assessments.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-11-02T18:37:08.777Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"document-redaction-review-record-quality-audit-string-normalisation-6be211d1"}