{"uid":"cap_VjVEGAW9eyXv5DnzGjelJ","slug":"payables-scheduling-record-quality-audit-numeric-row-ordering-5d34b875","name":"Payables Scheduling — Record Quality Audit + Numeric Row Ordering","description":"Payables scheduling — Record quality audit + Numeric row ordering: Record quality audit + Numeric row ordering for supplied payables scheduling records (due_amount, paid_amount). Up to 200 rows; 2 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 2 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-finance-21-007?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","instrument_group","date","due_amount","paid_amount"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"due_amount":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"paid_amount":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"instrument_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","due_amount":10,"paid_amount":1,"instrument_group":"group-a"},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","due_amount":20,"paid_amount":2,"instrument_group":"group-b"},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","due_amount":15,"paid_amount":3,"instrument_group":"group-a"},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","due_amount":30,"paid_amount":4,"instrument_group":"group-b"}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1},"field":{"enum":["due_amount","paid_amount"],"type":"string","default":"due_amount"}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_p5oD7rKcICHrPGpDRO1m0","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Audits data quality and orders rows numerically for payables scheduling records containing due_amount and paid_amount fields, returning two independent analytical reports for up to 200 rows.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a record quality audit and numeric row ordering on my payables scheduling data? Here are my rows with due_amount and paid_amount — sort them by due_amount and flag any quality issues across up to 200 records.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Payables data quality check before month-end close","prompt":"Before we close the books this month, can you audit the quality of our payables scheduling records and rank them by due_amount? I have about 150 rows with instrument groups and dates — flag anything that looks incomplete or invalid."},{"title":"Ranking vendor invoices by paid amount","prompt":"I have a set of payables rows for our vendor invoices and I want them ordered numerically by paid_amount, plus a quality audit to catch any missing or bad values. Can you run both reports on my data?"},{"title":"Identifying data gaps in payables scheduling export","prompt":"We exported our payables scheduling records from the ERP — can you do a quality audit on all the rows and also give me a numeric ordering by due_amount so I can see who owes the most? There are about 80 rows total."}],"resultDescription":"Two independent analytical reports: (1) a record quality audit identifying missing, null, or invalid values in the supplied payables scheduling rows, and (2) a numeric row ordering ranking records by the selected amount field (due_amount or paid_amount). Both reports are computed locally on the supplied data with no external lookups.","failureModes":["More than 200 rows submitted — exceeds maxItems limit","Missing required fields (row_id, instrument_group, date, due_amount, or paid_amount) causes validation error","Invalid date format (not YYYY-MM-DD) rejected by pattern validation","Numeric amount values outside ±1,000,000,000,000 range rejected","Empty rows array (minItems: 1 not satisfied)","Invalid field enum value (must be 'due_amount' or 'paid_amount')"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need both a data quality audit and numeric ordering of payables scheduling records in a single call at low cost ($0.01 USDC for both reports). It is well-suited for finance teams validating AP data before reconciliation or reporting, especially when working with batches up to 200 rows. Prefer this over general-purpose analytics when your data specifically contains due_amount and paid_amount fields in a payables scheduling context.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-11-02T12:32:18.008Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"payables-scheduling-record-quality-audit-numeric-row-ordering-5d34b875"}