{"uid":"cap_UO-w6uJlJdmJ9HU7JXCvq","slug":"record-routing-quality-audit-secondary-measure-weighted-mean-6ff44f10","name":"Record Routing Quality Audit + Secondary-Measure Weighted Mean","description":"Record routing — Record quality audit + Secondary-measure weighted mean: Record quality audit + Secondary-measure weighted mean for supplied record routing records (accepted_records, rejected_records). Up to 200 rows; 2 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 2 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-analytics-19-016?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","dataset_group","date","accepted_records","rejected_records"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"dataset_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80},"accepted_records":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"rejected_records":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","dataset_group":"group-a","accepted_records":10,"rejected_records":1},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","dataset_group":"group-b","accepted_records":20,"rejected_records":2},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","dataset_group":"group-a","accepted_records":15,"rejected_records":3},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","dataset_group":"group-b","accepted_records":30,"rejected_records":4}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1},"field":{"enum":["accepted_records","rejected_records"],"type":"string","default":"accepted_records"}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_q-_E_gi32RHNQhIdQj27N","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Runs two local analytical reports on record routing data: a quality audit of accepted/rejected records and a secondary-measure weighted mean, for up to 200 rows.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a quality audit and weighted mean analysis on my record routing data? I have rows for group-a and group-b from October 2026, with accepted_records as the primary field — here are the 4 rows with their accepted and rejected counts.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"ETL pipeline record quality check","prompt":"I've got a batch of 50 record routing rows from our ETL pipeline for November 2024, split across three dataset groups. Can you run a quality audit on them and compute the weighted mean for accepted_records so I can see where rejections are clustering?"},{"title":"Daily rejection rate audit for data team","prompt":"We're seeing elevated rejections in our routing layer — can you audit these 80 records from the past two weeks and give me a weighted mean of rejected_records across all dataset groups so I know which groups are worst?"},{"title":"Pre-release data pipeline validation","prompt":"Before we go live, I need a quality audit and secondary-measure weighted mean on our staging record routing data — here are 120 rows with accepted_records and rejected_records for group-staging-a and group-staging-b across the last 30 days."}],"resultDescription":"Returns two reports: (1) a record quality audit summarizing acceptance and rejection patterns across the supplied rows, and (2) a weighted mean computed for the selected field (accepted_records or rejected_records) weighted by a secondary measure, covering up to 200 rows across dataset groups and dates. No external lookups or predictions are made — all analysis is performed locally on the supplied data.","failureModes":["More than 200 rows submitted — endpoint only accepts up to 200 rows per call","Missing required fields (row_id, date, accepted_records, rejected_records) cause validation errors","Malformed date format (not YYYY-MM-DD) causes schema rejection","Invalid field enum value (not 'accepted_records' or 'rejected_records') causes error","Empty rows array returns an error","Numeric values outside allowed range cause validation failure"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need both a record quality audit AND a weighted mean computation on record routing data in a single call for up to 200 rows. It is ideal for data pipeline QA, ETL validation, and batch analytics on accepted/rejected record counts, especially when you want two independent analytical reports at low cost ($0.01 USDC) without any external data lookups or predictions.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-15T12:38:51.907Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"record-routing-quality-audit-secondary-measure-weighted-mean-6ff44f10"}