{"uid":"cap_TDnnlsgJWGKwvWfIVfhHZ","slug":"fact-check-workflow-audit-record-quality-numeric-row-ordering-167f8e7f","name":"Fact Check Workflow Audit — Record Quality + Numeric Row Ordering","description":"Fact check workflow — Record quality audit + Numeric row ordering: Record quality audit + Numeric row ordering for supplied fact check workflow records (claims_reviewed, references_collected). Up to 200 rows; 2 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 2 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-news-18-007?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","channel_group","date","claims_reviewed","references_collected"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"channel_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80},"claims_reviewed":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"references_collected":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","channel_group":"group-a","claims_reviewed":10,"references_collected":1},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","channel_group":"group-b","claims_reviewed":20,"references_collected":2},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","channel_group":"group-a","claims_reviewed":15,"references_collected":3},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","channel_group":"group-b","claims_reviewed":30,"references_collected":4}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1},"field":{"enum":["claims_reviewed","references_collected"],"type":"string","default":"claims_reviewed"}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_SCDOIGDuXEuhtYjPEjhIo","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Audits fact-check workflow records for data quality and ranks rows numerically by claims_reviewed or references_collected, returning two analytical reports for up to 200 rows.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a quality audit and numeric row ordering on my fact-check workflow records — here are 4 rows with claims_reviewed and references_collected data across two channel groups, and I want the analysis ranked by claims_reviewed?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"News team fact-check pipeline audit","prompt":"I have a week's worth of fact-check records from our two editorial channel groups — can you audit their data quality and rank the rows by claims_reviewed so I can see which days had the most activity?"},{"title":"References completeness check for research workflow","prompt":"Can you check these 50 rows of fact-checking data for quality issues and order them by references_collected? I need to know if any rows are missing or anomalous before I submit the monthly report."},{"title":"Multi-channel claims volume ranking","prompt":"I want to compare claims_reviewed across our group-a and group-b channels over the last quarter — please run a record quality audit and numeric ordering on these 120 rows ranked by claims_reviewed."}],"resultDescription":"Two analytical reports returned per call: (1) a record quality audit flagging data issues, nulls, and anomalies in the supplied rows, and (2) a numeric row ordering ranking all rows by the selected field (claims_reviewed or references_collected). No live data lookups or external actions are performed — analysis is entirely based on the supplied data.","failureModes":["Missing required fields (row_id, date, channel_group, claims_reviewed, references_collected) cause validation errors","Submitting more than 200 rows exceeds the row limit and will be rejected","Invalid date format (not YYYY-MM-DD) triggers a pattern validation error","Empty rows array returns an error as minItems is 1","Invalid field enum value (anything other than claims_reviewed or references_collected) causes a schema error","Payment failure via x402 protocol results in no response being returned"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need offline, supply-data-only analytical processing of fact-check workflow records — specifically a combined quality audit plus numeric ordering report in a single low-cost call. It is ideal when you have up to 200 rows of claims/references data segmented by channel group and date, and you do not need live lookups, predictions, or external integrations. Prefer alternatives if you need real-time data fetching, NLP-based claim verification, or more than two report types per call.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-25T12:33:19.954Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"fact-check-workflow-audit-record-quality-numeric-row-ordering-167f8e7f"}