{"uid":"cap_SO74Y6sPswpdbfQp0Qytz","slug":"technical-design-duplicate-paragraph-audit-8bcb502c","name":"Technical Design Duplicate Paragraph Audit","description":"Technical design - Duplicate paragraph audit: Duplicate paragraph audit for Technical design. Supplied Markdown or plain text, up to 20,000 characters. Deterministic processing and document templates; no generative prose or fact checking. One of 25 profiles or calculations across 20 shared operations in this sector. 0.01 USDC includes one bounded duplicate paragraph audit deliverable.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-sector-writing-technical-design-duplicate-paragraphs?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"text":{"type":"string","default":"## Architecture\nExample 1 content.\nTODO: review the supplied document by 2026-10-10.\n\n## Interfaces\nExample 2 content.\nTODO: review the supplied document by 2026-10-10.\n\n## Trade-offs\nExample 3 content.\nTODO: review the supplied document by 2026-10-10.","maxLength":20000}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_hOfZFLTNb0ISaWnVpNK9w","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Scans technical design documents (Markdown or plain text) for duplicate paragraphs and returns a bounded audit report.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you audit this technical design document for duplicate paragraphs? Here's the Markdown: '## Architecture\nThe system uses a microservices approach.\n\n## Deployment\nThe system uses a microservices approach.\n\n## Trade-offs\nLatency is a concern.'","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Architecture doc duplicate check","prompt":"I just finished drafting a 3,000-word architecture Markdown doc and I want to make sure I didn't accidentally repeat any paragraphs — can you run a duplicate paragraph audit on it for me?"},{"title":"Tech spec review before PR","prompt":"Before I open this pull request, can you check my technical design spec for any copy-pasted or duplicated paragraph blocks? Here's the full Markdown text."},{"title":"Cleaning up a legacy design doc","prompt":"I inherited this old technical design document and I suspect there's a lot of repeated content from different contributors — can you audit it for duplicate paragraphs and tell me what's repeated?"}],"resultDescription":"A bounded audit report identifying duplicate paragraphs found within the submitted technical design document, including the locations or labels of repeated content blocks. The output is deterministic and template-driven — no generative prose or AI-invented content.","failureModes":["Input text exceeds 20,000 character limit — request rejected","Empty or missing text field — no audit performed","Non-text binary content submitted — parsing failure","Payment not included or rejected — 402 response","Malformed JSON body — 400 error"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a fast, deterministic, low-cost ($0.01 USDC) audit of a technical design document specifically for duplicate paragraphs. It is ideal for pre-review checks on architecture docs, technical specs, or design Markdown files where repeatability and consistency of output matter. Prefer it over LLM-based analysis when you need deterministic results rather than subjective editorial feedback.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-15T00:50:26.140Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"technical-design-duplicate-paragraph-audit-8bcb502c"}