{"uid":"cap_Ol0Ld-AlHLULel7dVawBd","slug":"novapath-compensation-evidence-audit-c09524d8","name":"NovaPath Compensation Evidence Audit","description":"Review up to eight role evidence packets for JD/PAQ coverage, comparable scales, duty alignment, wage-basis issues and reuse restrictions. Produces a prioritized review queue, not salary recommendations.","url":"https://instructional-decision-engine-x402.vercel.app/compensation/evidence-audit?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"roles":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["jdScore","paqScore","sameScaleVerified","comparatorDutiesVerified","benchmarkKind","permittedUse","hoursBasisVerified"],"properties":{"jdScore":{"anyOf":[{"type":"number","maximum":10000,"minimum":0},{"type":"null"}]},"paqScore":{"anyOf":[{"type":"number","maximum":10000,"minimum":0},{"type":"null"}]},"permittedUse":{"enum":["approved","unknown","prohibited"],"type":"string"},"benchmarkKind":{"enum":["published_wage_estimate","job_posting","licensed_benchmark","not_supplied"],"type":"string"},"sameScaleVerified":{"type":"boolean"},"hoursBasisVerified":{"type":"boolean"},"comparatorDutiesVerified":{"type":"boolean"}},"additionalProperties":false},"maxItems":8,"minItems":1},"reviewDifferenceThreshold":{"type":"number","maximum":10000,"minimum":0}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.35","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.35/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.35","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.35","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_1GocuIMB2jL9kMO9Sgc9y","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.35","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Audits up to eight role evidence packets for JD/PAQ coverage, comparable scales, duty alignment, wage-basis issues, and reuse restrictions, returning a prioritized review queue.","exampleAgentPrompt":"I have 3 roles to evidence-audit for our compensation review — Role A has JD score 420, PAQ score 390, same scale verified, comparator duties verified, benchmark kind is published_wage_estimate, permitted use approved, hours basis verified; Role B has JD score 610, PAQ score null, same scale not verified, comparator duties not verified, benchmark kind job_posting, permitted use unknown, hours basis not verified; Role C has JD score 280, PAQ score 300, same scale verified, comparator duties verified, benchmark kind licensed_benchmark, permitted use prohibited, hours basis verified — please run a coverage and compliance audit with a review difference threshold of 50 and give me the prioritized review queue.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-submission pay equity evidence screen","prompt":"Before we submit our pay equity analysis, audit these 5 roles for us — each has JD and PAQ scores, scale verification status, duty alignment flags, benchmark types ranging from published_wage_estimate to job_posting, permitted use statuses, and hours-basis flags. Set the review difference threshold to 100 and tell me which roles need attention first."},{"title":"Flagging prohibited benchmark reuse","prompt":"We suspect two of our eight roles are using benchmarks with prohibited reuse — can you run a full evidence audit on all eight packets, including their permittedUse values and benchmarkKind fields, and prioritize any that come back as prohibited or unknown so we know which ones to pull before our compensation meeting?"},{"title":"Scale consistency check across roles","prompt":"We're unsure whether our comparator scales are consistent across four roles we benchmarked from different sources — each has a sameScaleVerified flag and PAQ and JD scores. Can you audit those four evidence packets with a difference threshold of 75 and show me the prioritized queue so we know where the scale mismatches are?"}],"resultDescription":"Returns a prioritized review queue of the submitted role evidence packets, ranked by severity of identified issues such as JD/PAQ coverage gaps, scale mismatches, duty misalignment, wage-basis problems, and reuse restrictions. Does not produce salary recommendations.","failureModes":["Missing required fields (jdScore, paqScore, permittedUse, benchmarkKind, sameScaleVerified, hoursBasisVerified, comparatorDutiesVerified) cause validation errors","Submitting more than 8 roles exceeds the maxItems constraint and is rejected","Invalid enum values for permittedUse or benchmarkKind cause schema rejection","reviewDifferenceThreshold outside 0–10000 range is rejected","Empty roles array (fewer than 1 item) returns an error","Payment failure (x402) results in no response being returned"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a structured, prioritized audit of compensation evidence packets across multiple roles — specifically checking JD/PAQ score coverage, benchmark scale consistency, duty alignment, wage-basis validity, and data reuse permissions — before undertaking a broader pay equity or classification analysis. It is not a salary recommender; use it upstream of any compensation decision workflow to identify which evidence packets require remediation.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-31T18:40:36.357Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"novapath-compensation-evidence-audit-c09524d8"}