{"uid":"cap_JvgH33rT_C-y2Y7peWcSc","slug":"economic-order-quantity-record-ranking-ecfc4c8f","name":"Economic Order Quantity Record Ranking","description":"Economic order quantity - Record ranking: Record ranking for Economic order quantity. Supplied retail figures only. Local calculation and scenario analysis; no live inventory, account access, platform fee lookup or order execution. One of 25 profiles or calculations across 20 shared operations in this sector. 0.01 USDC includes one bounded record ranking deliverable.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-sector-retail-economic-order-rank?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["annual_demand","order_cost","annual_holding_cost_per_unit"],"properties":{"order_cost":{"type":"number","default":20,"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":0},"annual_demand":{"type":"number","default":1000,"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":0},"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":{"type":"number","default":2,"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":0,"exclusiveMinimum":0}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"order_cost":20,"annual_demand":1000,"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":2},{"order_cost":22,"annual_demand":1100,"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":2.2},{"order_cost":20,"annual_demand":1000,"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":2},{"order_cost":22,"annual_demand":1100,"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":2.2}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":2}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_W2crAnGJJGCbDJumVuKBs","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Ranks multiple sets of EOQ inputs by their calculated economic order quantity values, enabling scenario comparison across retail inventory configurations.","exampleAgentPrompt":"I have four product scenarios with different annual demands and costs — can you rank them by their economic order quantity? Scenario 1: annual demand 1000, order cost $20, holding cost $2/unit. Scenario 2: annual demand 1100, order cost $22, holding cost $2.20/unit. Scenario 3: annual demand 800, order cost $15, holding cost $1.50/unit. Scenario 4: annual demand 1500, order cost $30, holding cost $3/unit.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Ranking SKUs by restocking efficiency","prompt":"I have five products in my store and want to know which ones have the smallest optimal order quantity — here are the numbers: SKU A has annual demand 500, order cost $10, holding cost $1.50/unit; SKU B has demand 2000, order cost $50, holding cost $3/unit; SKU C has demand 800, order cost $25, holding cost $2/unit; SKU D has demand 1200, order cost $18, holding cost $2.50/unit; SKU E has demand 3000, order cost $40, holding cost $4/unit. Rank them all by EOQ."},{"title":"Comparing supplier cost scenarios","prompt":"I'm evaluating two supplier contracts with different order costs and want to rank them by their economic order quantity. Option 1: annual demand 1000, order cost $20, holding cost $2/unit. Option 2: same demand 1000, but order cost drops to $12 and holding cost rises to $3/unit. Which scenario produces a lower EOQ?"},{"title":"Seasonal inventory planning comparison","prompt":"For our upcoming holiday season, I have three restocking scenarios to compare — can you rank them by their EOQ? Winter stock: demand 4000, order cost $60, holding $5/unit. Spring stock: demand 1500, order cost $25, holding $2.50/unit. Clearance items: demand 600, order cost $8, holding $1/unit."}],"resultDescription":"Returns a ranked list of the submitted product/scenario rows ordered by their computed Economic Order Quantity (EOQ = sqrt(2 × annual_demand × order_cost / annual_holding_cost_per_unit)), along with each row's EOQ value and its rank position among the submitted records.","failureModes":["Fewer than 2 rows submitted — minimum of 2 rows required","annual_holding_cost_per_unit set to zero — excluded via exclusiveMinimum constraint, returns validation error","Rows exceed 200 item maximum — request rejected","Non-numeric values in numeric fields — schema validation failure","Missing required fields (annual_demand, order_cost, annual_holding_cost_per_unit) — validation error"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need to compare and rank multiple inventory or retail scenarios by their optimal order quantity simultaneously, rather than calculating a single EOQ in isolation. It is best suited for local, offline scenario analysis where you have retail demand and cost figures ready and need a ranked deliverable without live inventory system access or order execution.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-18T00:58:33.846Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"economic-order-quantity-record-ranking-ecfc4c8f"}