{"uid":"cap_Joe05b7Y_SHSRMh0S5xk-","slug":"chainverdict-erc-20-token-safety-verdict-ad1b017a","name":"ChainVerdict ERC-20 Token Safety Verdict","description":"Token safety check for an ERC-20 on Base: is this token a scam, a honeypot, or safe to hold? Examines ownership and mint authority, proxy upgradeability, liquidity and holder concentration, transfer-restriction patterns. Returns hold/caution/avoid with a score and the signals behind it. Heuristic static analysis, not a security audit — a proxy contract can change its implementation after this check.","url":"https://chainverdict.xyz/v1/token/verdict/:address","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET"],"type":"string"},"pathParams":{"type":"object","required":["address"],"properties":{"address":{"type":"string","description":"ERC-20 token contract address on Base"}}},"queryParams":{"type":"object","properties":{}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":true}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_OpvitgzCF0BZc1CxXdPdX","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Returns a hold/caution/avoid safety verdict with a risk score and detailed signals for an ERC-20 token on Base, covering ownership, mint authority, proxy upgradeability, liquidity, and transfer restrictions.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Before I buy any of this token, can you run a safety check on the Base ERC-20 at 0x4ed4E862860beD51a9570b96d89aF5E1B0Efefed — I want to know if it's a hold, caution, or avoid, and what the key risk signals are like mint authority or transfer restrictions?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-trade token safety screen","prompt":"I'm about to swap some ETH for this new Base token at contract 0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913 — can you give me a safety verdict on it and flag anything sketchy like uncapped minting or blacklist functions?"},{"title":"DeFi bot rug-pull risk gate","prompt":"My trading bot wants to take a position in the ERC-20 at 0x2Ae3F1Ec7F1F5012CFEab0185bfc7aa3cf0DEc22 on Base — run a safety verdict and only proceed if the result comes back as hold with a decent score, otherwise abort."},{"title":"Token research due diligence","prompt":"I'm writing a report on Base memecoins — can you pull the ChainVerdict safety analysis for 0xd9aAEc86B65D86f6A7B5B1b0c42FFA531710b6CA and tell me whether it's flagged for proxy upgradeability or holder concentration issues?"}],"resultDescription":"A structured JSON response containing a verdict label (hold, caution, or avoid), a numeric risk score, and individual signal breakdowns covering ownership and mint authority risks, proxy upgradeability status, liquidity and holder concentration metrics, and any detected transfer-restriction patterns that informed the verdict.","failureModes":["Invalid or non-ERC-20 contract address returns an error or empty verdict","Address does not exist on Base network — returns not-found error","Proxy contract has changed implementation after analysis — verdict may be stale","Highly obfuscated contracts may evade heuristic detection, producing a falsely optimistic score","Network congestion on Base may delay on-chain reads","Rate limiting or payment failure returns 402 or 429 error"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a quick, structured risk classification of an ERC-20 token on Base before executing a trade, adding to a watchlist, or routing user funds — especially when you want signals across multiple risk dimensions (mint authority, proxy risk, liquidity concentration, transfer restrictions) in a single call. Prefer it over manual contract inspection for automated agent pipelines. Note it is heuristic static analysis, not a formal audit, so supplement with deeper review for large positions or novel contract patterns.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-13T12:47:25.447Z","isFirstParty":false}