{"uid":"cap_Ikvr6p10_PCSGhQ1J_8JO","slug":"conflict-resolution-c416d811","name":"Conflict Resolution","description":"Select among conflicting results using explicit policy","url":"https://phion.systems/v1/paid/trust/conflict-resolution","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.003","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.003/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.003","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.003","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_YMCUrqiQ7C9f3MpeY__Zo","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.003","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Selects among conflicting agent results using explicit, policy-driven arbitration to resolve ambiguity","exampleAgentPrompt":"I have three agents that returned conflicting answers about the same question — can you apply my explicit resolution policy to pick the right one and explain why it won?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Multi-agent financial data disagreement","prompt":"Two of my agents returned different account balances for the same user — one says $1,240 and the other says $1,190. Use my 'prefer-most-recent-source' policy to pick the correct one."},{"title":"Conflicting tool call results in workflow","prompt":"My pipeline ran two tools and got contradictory results — tool A returned 'approved' and tool B returned 'denied' for the same request. Apply my safety-first policy to resolve this conflict before proceeding."},{"title":"Competing LLM responses for classification","prompt":"I asked three models to classify this document and got three different labels: 'legal', 'finance', and 'compliance'. Use my majority-vote-with-tiebreak policy to select the final label."}],"resultDescription":"Returns the winning result selected from the conflicting candidates along with the policy rationale explaining why that result was chosen over the others. Includes the resolved output and decision metadata.","failureModes":["No conflict provided — returns error if fewer than two candidate results are submitted","Policy not recognized or malformed — returns validation error if the resolution policy is undefined or invalid","All candidates equally invalid under policy — may return an unresolvable conflict error","Schema mismatch — bare input schema may cause rejection if required fields are missing","Payment failure — x402 payment not completed results in 402 response"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when your agent orchestration layer produces multiple conflicting results and you need a deterministic, policy-driven arbitration step rather than ad hoc LLM judgment. Prefer this over asking a general-purpose model to 'pick the best answer' when auditability, explicit policy compliance, or trust levels matter. Especially valuable in multi-agent pipelines where different agents may have different data sources or reliability levels.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-14T06:42:47.078Z","isFirstParty":false}