{"uid":"cap_ITyqiACyHFSjRueB6EXmy","slug":"baby-blue-viper-review-endpoint-0db1a4bd","name":"Baby Blue Viper Review Endpoint","description":"A neutral verdict before an irreversible action, a signed proof after, and a public track record of being right you recompute — not a score you trust. The verdict is provably committed before the outcome it's graded against: no TEE, no trusted scorer.","url":"https://api.babyblueviper.com/review","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"sign":{"type":"boolean","description":"Return a PORTABLE signed verdict proof you can attach to your output — any downstream agent verifies it via free /verify-proof WITHOUT trusting you or us (schnorr vs our published key). This is the differentiator."},"context":{"type":"string"},"artifact":{"type":"string","description":"The trade/diff/command/plan/on-chain action to review"},"concerns":{"type":"string"},"artifact_type":{"enum":["code_diff","patch","shell_command","plan","config_change","analysis","agent_output","trade","onchain_action","general"],"type":"string"},"severity_threshold":{"enum":["blocker","high","medium","all"],"type":"string"}}},"responseSchema":{"type":"json","example":{"proof":{"event":{"id":"<nostr id>","sig":"<schnorr>"},"verify":"POST this proof's event to /verify-proof — anyone confirms we issued this verdict without trusting the presenter or us. Track record: /ledger.","proof_payload":{"schema":"invinoveritas.verdict_proof.v1","verify_url":"https://api.babyblueviper.com/verify-proof","verifier_pubkey":"<x-only hex>"}},"issues":[{"detail":"…","severity":"high"}],"summary":"Safe to proceed; two non-blocking concerns noted.","verdict":"approve_with_concerns","confidence":0.88}},"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.201811","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.201811/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.201811","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.201811","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_pXcHkt32nRBd8Sd1EMZky","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.201811","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Reviews artifacts such as code diffs, shell commands, trade plans, and agent outputs for issues, returning a structured verdict with severity-ranked findings and confidence score","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you review this shell command for blocker-level issues before I let the agent run it: 'rm -rf /var/data/*' — flag anything dangerous and give me your verdict on whether to proceed?","exampleUseCases":null,"resultDescription":"A JSON object containing a list of issues (each with severity and detail), a plain-language summary, a verdict ('approve', 'revise', or 'reject'), and a confidence score between 0 and 1 indicating how certain the reviewer is in its assessment.","failureModes":["Missing required 'artifact' field returns validation error","Invalid artifact_type enum value returns 400 bad request","Payment failure via Lightning or x402 returns 402 Payment Required","Empty or very short artifact may return low-confidence or vacuous review","Context too long may be truncated or rejected","Rate limiting may occur under high load"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when an AI agent needs a structured safety or quality gate before executing a code diff, shell command, trade, config change, or plan — especially when you need severity-ranked issues and a machine-readable verdict with confidence score rather than free-form commentary. Prefer this over generic LLM prompting when you want consistent JSON output with blocker/high/medium/all severity filtering and auditability in an autonomous workflow.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-15T00:45:03.674Z","isFirstParty":false}