{"uid":"cap_HB2hEQ8747o9qoYnLbuGW","slug":"procurement-notices-duplicate-record-identity-grouper-570e2ad2","name":"Procurement Notices - Duplicate Record Identity Grouper","description":"Group declared organization/record/revision identities and compare every source, jurisdiction, record-kind and content Supplied-record analysis, not independent certification. Full contract at the free describe URL.","url":"https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/intel/procurement-notices/duplicate-record-identities?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","maxItems":32,"minItems":1},"dataClass":{"enum":["public","synthetic"],"type":"string"},"nonpersonalMetadata":{"type":"boolean","const":true}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.010335","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.010335/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.010335","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.010335","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_ws96uvrtidc31DrNIhzUn","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.010335","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Groups and compares procurement notice records by declared organization, revision, and identity fields to surface duplicate or conflicting entries across sources, jurisdictions, and record kinds.","exampleAgentPrompt":"I've got a batch of up to 30 procurement notice rows from multiple jurisdictions and I need to group them by their declared identities and flag any duplicates or conflicts across sources and record kinds — treat this as public data and mark nonpersonalMetadata as true.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-ingestion deduplication of tender notices","prompt":"Before we load these 20 procurement notice rows into our database, can you group them by declared identity and tell me which ones are duplicates across different sources or jurisdictions? The data is public and contains no personal metadata."},{"title":"Audit conflicting procurement revisions","prompt":"I have 15 synthetic procurement notice records and I need to know if any share the same organization or record identity but differ in revision — group them and highlight where there are conflicts. Mark nonpersonalMetadata as true."},{"title":"Cross-jurisdiction procurement overlap check","prompt":"Can you analyze these 25 public procurement notices and group any that look like the same underlying contract appearing under different jurisdictions or record kinds? NonpersonalMetadata is true."}],"resultDescription":"Returns groupings of procurement notice rows that share declared organizational or record identities, with per-group comparisons of source, jurisdiction, record kind, and revision fields to highlight duplicates and conflicts. This is a supplied-record analysis, not independent certification.","failureModes":["Exceeds 32-row limit — request rejected with validation error","Invalid dataClass value (not 'public' or 'synthetic') — schema validation failure","nonpersonalMetadata not set to true — request rejected","Empty rows array — minItems violation","Ambiguous or missing identity fields in input rows may reduce grouping accuracy"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when you have a batch of up to 32 procurement notice records and need to detect duplicates or identity conflicts across sources, jurisdictions, or revision histories before storing or processing them. It is best suited for data quality checks on public or synthetic procurement data with nonpersonal metadata. Prefer it over generic deduplication tools when your data is specifically procurement notices and you need cross-source and cross-jurisdiction comparison semantics.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-16T12:43:25.189Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"procurement-notices-duplicate-record-identity-grouper-570e2ad2"}