{"uid":"cap_GsRA8WYrDKYSbY8O2rVlE","slug":"token-transfer-receipt-fraction-named-scenario-comparison-6d743b71","name":"Token Transfer Receipt Fraction — Named Scenario Comparison","description":"Token transfer receipt fraction — Named scenario comparison: Named scenario comparison for Token transfer receipt fraction. Supplied token observations only. Deterministic calculation or caller-threshold verdict, not a live scan, safety proof or trade recommendation. Specialised preset in a shared 50-profile, 20-operation engine. 0.01 USDC includes one bounded named scenario comparison report.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-bx-token-transfer-receipt-scenario?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"baseline":{"type":"object","default":{"sent_tokens":1000,"received_tokens":990},"required":["received_tokens","sent_tokens"],"properties":{"sent_tokens":{"type":"number","default":1000,"maximum":10000000000000000,"minimum":0,"exclusiveMinimum":0},"received_tokens":{"type":"number","default":990,"maximum":10000000000000000,"minimum":0}},"additionalProperties":false},"scenarios":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["label","overrides"],"properties":{"label":{"type":"string","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"overrides":{"type":"object","properties":{"sent_tokens":{"type":"number","default":1000,"maximum":10000000000000000,"minimum":0,"exclusiveMinimum":0},"received_tokens":{"type":"number","default":990,"maximum":10000000000000000,"minimum":0}},"minProperties":1,"additionalProperties":false}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"label":"Supplied alternative","overrides":{"received_tokens":1089}}],"maxItems":20,"minItems":1}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_sBCBl-l7jyR9fLRrMtH1u","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Computes and compares the token transfer receipt fraction (received/sent ratio) across multiple named scenarios against a baseline, returning a deterministic verdict for each scenario.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Compare my token transfer receipt fraction: baseline is 1000 sent and 990 received. Then show me two named scenarios — 'Low slippage' with 995 received, and 'High slippage' with 900 received — and tell me which performs better.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Slippage scenario modeling for DeFi swap","prompt":"My baseline token transfer is 5000 sent and 4950 received. Compare two scenarios for me: 'Tight pool' where I receive 4990 tokens, and 'Volatile pool' where I only get 4700 — label them clearly and tell me the receipt fraction for each."},{"title":"Quality check on bridge transfer outcomes","prompt":"I'm sending 100000 tokens across a bridge. Baseline is 100000 sent, 99500 received. Run a named scenario comparison with 'Bridge A' getting 99800 received and 'Bridge B' getting 98000 received, so I can see which is more efficient."},{"title":"Threshold verdict for token delivery audit","prompt":"Audit my token delivery: baseline is 2000 sent and 1980 received. Add a scenario called 'Adjusted fee' where only 1950 tokens arrive, and tell me the receipt fraction difference versus the baseline."}],"resultDescription":"Returns a named scenario comparison report containing the computed receipt fraction (received_tokens / sent_tokens) for the baseline and each supplied named scenario, along with a deterministic comparison verdict indicating how each scenario deviates from the baseline. No live market data or safety proofs are included; results are purely calculated from supplied values.","failureModes":["sent_tokens set to 0 triggers exclusiveMinimum validation error","received_tokens exceeding maximum (10^16) causes schema rejection","scenarios array empty or missing causes validation failure","label exceeding 80 characters rejected","overrides object with no properties (minProperties:1 not met) causes error","payment of less than 0.01 USDC results in 402 payment required","malformed JSON body returns 400 bad request"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need a fast, deterministic, side-effect-free comparison of token transfer receipt fractions across up to 20 named scenarios against a single baseline — especially useful for modeling slippage, bridge efficiency, or fee impact without requiring live blockchain data. Prefer this over general-purpose calculators when you need labeled, structured scenario outputs in a single call.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-13T00:41:55.274Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"token-transfer-receipt-fraction-named-scenario-comparison-6d743b71"}