{"uid":"cap_CtC3b3OjUZVnJN-H7PsyQ","slug":"business-frameworks-adjacency-decision-engine-57733a62","name":"Business Frameworks Adjacency Decision Engine","description":"","url":"https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/growth/decide/adjacency?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method","bodyType","body"],"properties":{"body":{"type":"object","required":["core_not_at_risk","can_be_top_three","only_move_under_way","reuses_core"],"properties":{"move":{"type":"string","description":"the candidate move, in a phrase"},"reuses_core":{"type":"boolean","description":"reuses core customers, channels or capabilities"},"can_be_top_three":{"type":"boolean","description":"the company can plausibly be one of the top three in the new segment"},"core_not_at_risk":{"type":"boolean"},"failure_patterns":{"type":"object","properties":{"forced_bundling":{"type":"boolean"},"entrenched_incumbent":{"type":"boolean"},"overestimated_profit_pool":{"type":"boolean"},"entrant_from_unexpected_side":{"type":"boolean"},"unmapped_alternative_adjacency":{"type":"boolean"},"segment_forming_inside_existing_market":{"type":"boolean"},"high_end_move_that_only_looks_like_core":{"type":"boolean"}},"description":"true where the pattern applies to this move"},"only_move_under_way":{"type":"boolean"},"stop_condition_written":{"type":"boolean"}}},"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["POST"],"type":"string"},"bodyType":{"enum":["json","form-data","text"],"type":"string"}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object"}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.05","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"registry","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.05/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.05","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.05","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_Xmjim9hC8es5LF9MFflco","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.05","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":null,"unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Deterministically approves or refuses a business adjacency move by checking four strategic screens and failure-pattern tests against the caller's inputs.","exampleAgentPrompt":"We're considering expanding our SaaS analytics platform into BI consulting services — check whether this adjacency move should be approved: our core is not at risk, we can plausibly be top three in that segment, we reuse our existing enterprise customers and data capabilities, it's our only move under way, we have a stop condition written, and I see possible risks of entrenched incumbent and overestimated profit pool.","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"SaaS platform entering adjacent vertical","prompt":"Run our adjacency decision for moving from project management software into HR software: core is not at risk, we can be top three, we reuse our existing SMB customers and workflow capabilities, it's our only move, we have a stop condition, and I'm flagging forced bundling and entrenched incumbent as risk patterns."},{"title":"Retailer considering private-label expansion","prompt":"We're a specialty outdoor retailer thinking about launching our own private-label gear line — is this adjacency approved? Core is not at risk, we believe we can be top three in private-label outdoor gear, we reuse our existing customers and supplier channels, it's our only move under way, and we don't have a stop condition written. Flag any failure patterns you see."},{"title":"Agency adding software product to services","prompt":"Should we approve our adjacency move from marketing agency services into a SaaS marketing automation product? Core not at risk: yes, can be top three: yes, reuses core customers and delivery capabilities: yes, only move under way: yes, stop condition written: no — and I think there's a risk of high-end move that only looks like core and an unmapped alternative adjacency."}],"resultDescription":"Returns an approve or refuse verdict, names any failing screens among the four strategic tests, lists which failure patterns triggered, and includes the full node rule text with its public citations so the decision is fully traceable.","failureModes":["Missing required boolean fields (core_not_at_risk, can_be_top_three, only_move_under_way, reuses_core) returns a 400 validation error","Malformed JSON body returns a parsing error","Payment not included or insufficient USDC balance returns a 402 Payment Required response","Schema mismatch on failure_patterns object structure returns a validation error"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when you need a deterministic, rule-based go/no-go on a specific adjacency move and want the decision traceable to a named framework node with citations — not a qualitative AI opinion. Ideal when you have already gathered the four screen answers and optionally mapped failure patterns, and need a structured approve/refuse verdict that can feed an automated workflow or decision log.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-11T18:42:31.071Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"business-frameworks-adjacency-decision-engine-57733a62"}