{"uid":"cap_9yTVdgbs0KtofqvYf8ZP_","slug":"economic-order-quantity-base-100-rebase-report-a326acc2","name":"Economic Order Quantity Base-100 Rebase Report","description":"Economic order quantity - Base-100 rebase report: Base-100 rebase report for Economic order quantity. Supplied retail figures only. Local calculation and scenario analysis; no live inventory, account access, platform fee lookup or order execution. One of 25 profiles or calculations across 20 shared operations in this sector. 0.01 USDC includes one bounded base-100 rebase report deliverable.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-sector-retail-economic-order-index?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["annual_demand","order_cost","annual_holding_cost_per_unit"],"properties":{"order_cost":{"type":"number","default":20,"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":0},"annual_demand":{"type":"number","default":1000,"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":0},"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":{"type":"number","default":2,"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":0,"exclusiveMinimum":0}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"order_cost":20,"annual_demand":1000,"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":2},{"order_cost":22,"annual_demand":1100,"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":2.2},{"order_cost":20,"annual_demand":1000,"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":2},{"order_cost":22,"annual_demand":1100,"annual_holding_cost_per_unit":2.2}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":2},"base_index":{"type":"integer","default":0,"maximum":199,"minimum":0}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_uK6qfeBFfOsmnP-G22CqX","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Computes a base-100 rebased index of Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) values across a series of retail scenarios for comparative analysis","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a base-100 EOQ rebase report comparing these four scenarios: first, annual demand 1000, order cost $20, holding cost $2/unit; second, annual demand 1100, order cost $22, holding cost $2.20/unit; third, annual demand 900, order cost $18, holding cost $1.80/unit; fourth, annual demand 1200, order cost $25, holding cost $2.50/unit — and use the first scenario as the baseline index of 100?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Multi-SKU EOQ benchmarking for retail buyer","prompt":"I have five products with different demand and cost profiles and I want to normalize their economic order quantities to a base-100 index using our top-selling SKU as the reference — can you run that EOQ rebase report? The reference SKU has annual demand 5000, order cost $50, holding cost $4/unit, and the others range from demand 2000 to 8000 with varying costs."},{"title":"Cost sensitivity scenario analysis","prompt":"I want to see how my EOQ changes if holding costs rise from $2 to $3 to $4 per unit while demand stays at 1000 units and order cost stays at $20 — can you rebase all those scenarios to a base-100 index anchored to the $2 holding cost case so I can see the relative impact?"},{"title":"Supplier negotiation order cost comparison","prompt":"We're evaluating two suppliers with different order costs: $15, $20, and $25, all with annual demand of 2500 and holding cost $3/unit — run a base-100 EOQ rebase report using the $15 order cost scenario as the baseline so I can quantify the relative difference in optimal order quantities."}],"resultDescription":"Returns a base-100 rebased report showing normalized EOQ values for each input row, where the designated base_index row is set to 100 and all other rows are expressed as a proportion relative to it, enabling direct comparison of economic order quantities across retail scenarios. No live inventory, pricing, or account data is accessed — all calculations are performed locally on the supplied figures.","failureModes":["Fewer than 2 rows supplied — minimum row count not met","annual_holding_cost_per_unit set to 0 — division by zero in EOQ formula (exclusiveMinimum enforced)","base_index references a row position that doesn't exist in the submitted array","More than 200 rows submitted — exceeds maxItems limit","Negative values for demand, order cost, or holding cost — schema validation failure","Payment not completed via x402 protocol — request rejected before computation"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need to compare multiple Economic Order Quantity scenarios on a normalized, base-100 scale — for example, when benchmarking SKUs, analyzing cost sensitivity, or presenting relative order quantity changes to stakeholders. It is purely computational (no live data, no external integrations) and well-suited for local what-if analysis using supplied retail figures. Prefer it over raw EOQ calculators when relative comparison across scenarios matters more than absolute values.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-18T19:03:21.657Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"economic-order-quantity-base-100-rebase-report-a326acc2"}