{"uid":"cap_8TO4RCoOE2Qe7pu0tJ-x7","slug":"contract-amendments-duplicate-record-identities-d7e45bda","name":"Contract Amendments — Duplicate Record Identities","description":"Group repeated amendment IDs by revision digest, distinguishing identical duplicate rows from conflicting revisions. No amendment validity judgment. Offline typed metadata only. Retained-result recovery: 24 hours; minimal receipt metadata: 90 days.","url":"https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/context/contract-amendments/duplicate-record-identities?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"records":{"type":"array","maxItems":32,"minItems":1},"dataClass":{"enum":["public","synthetic"],"type":"string"},"nonpersonalMetadata":{"type":"boolean","const":true}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.010292","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.010292/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.010292","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.010292","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_Vvu257eVcIQ_XfXK4raSM","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.010292","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Groups repeated contract amendment IDs by revision digest to distinguish identical duplicate rows from conflicting revisions, without making validity judgments.","exampleAgentPrompt":"I have a batch of up to 32 contract amendment records marked as synthetic data — can you group them by revision digest so I can see which repeated amendment IDs are exact duplicates versus conflicting revisions?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Audit contract amendment dataset for conflicts","prompt":"I'm auditing a set of contract amendment records and need to know which ones share the same amendment ID but have different content — can you group these synthetic records by revision digest and flag the conflicting ones versus the true duplicates?"},{"title":"Pre-ingestion deduplication of amendment exports","prompt":"Before I import these amendment rows into our system, can you run them through duplicate identity detection so I know which repeated IDs are safe identical copies and which ones represent conflicting revisions I need to resolve? Mark the data as synthetic and non-personal."},{"title":"Reconciling amendment versions across contract drafts","prompt":"We have up to 32 public amendment records pulled from two contract drafts and some IDs appear more than once — can you group them by their revision digest to tell me which duplicates are identical and which are actually different versions of the same amendment?"}],"resultDescription":"Returns amendment records grouped by revision digest, with each group labeled to indicate whether repeated amendment IDs represent identical duplicate rows or conflicting revisions. No validity judgment is made on the amendments themselves. Results are retained for 24 hours; minimal receipt metadata is retained for 90 days.","failureModes":["Input array exceeds 32 records — request rejected","nonpersonalMetadata not set to true — request rejected","dataClass not one of 'public' or 'synthetic' — validation error","Empty records array (fewer than 1 item) — validation error","Downstream timeout if digest computation is slow on large records","Result expired after 24-hour retention window — receipt only recoverable for 90 days"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need to programmatically distinguish true duplicate amendment rows (identical content) from conflicting revisions sharing the same amendment ID, without any downstream validity assessment. It is best suited for offline, typed metadata workflows on public or synthetic data where personal data is absent. Prefer this over generic deduplication tools when the domain is specifically contract amendments and you need revision-digest-level grouping rather than simple field-matching.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-19T06:44:47.639Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"contract-amendments-duplicate-record-identities-d7e45bda"}