{"uid":"cap_3pqawb4KBfAfJ9p-5i5wj","slug":"redacted-partners-tiebreaker-c6e727c5","name":"Redacted Partners Tiebreaker","description":"Decision arbitration: submit context, options, constraints, and risk_tolerance; receive a structured JSON verdict with confidence score, reasoning, and escalation flag.","url":"https://api.redactedpartners.com/tiebreaker","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"options":{"type":"string"},"constraints":{"type":"string"}}},"responseSchema":{"type":"json","example":{"flags":["example caveat"],"verdict":"Vendor A","reasoning":"Vendor A wins over Vendor B because it beats it on cost, at the cost of nothing identifiable.","confidence":0.9,"escalate_recommended":false}},"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.09","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.09/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.09","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.09","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_1nIlBrnRQpAJs3dcbfq9V","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.09","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Accepts a set of options, constraints, and context to return a structured AI-generated verdict with confidence score, reasoning, and escalation flag","exampleAgentPrompt":"I'm stuck between Vendor A and Vendor B for our cloud storage contract — Vendor A is cheaper but less established, Vendor B is pricier but has better SLAs; given that our constraint is budget under $5k/month and we have low risk tolerance, which should we pick and how confident are you?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Vendor selection for procurement","prompt":"We're evaluating two software vendors: Vendor A costs $3k/month with 99.5% uptime SLA, Vendor B costs $4.5k/month with 99.9% uptime SLA. Our constraint is we can't exceed $4k/month and we need at least 99.5% uptime. Which vendor should we go with and why?"},{"title":"Hiring candidate arbitration","prompt":"I have two final candidates for our senior engineer role: Candidate A has 8 years of experience but wants remote-only, Candidate B has 5 years but is willing to be on-site twice a week. Our constraint is we need some in-office presence. Tell me which to hire and flag it if you think this needs human escalation."},{"title":"Strategic roadmap prioritization","prompt":"I need to decide between launching Feature X now — it has high revenue potential but high dev cost — versus Feature Y which has moderate revenue but low cost, given our constraint of a $50k budget ceiling and a moderate risk tolerance. Give me a structured verdict with your reasoning."}],"resultDescription":"A JSON object containing a 'verdict' field naming the winning option, a 'reasoning' string explaining why, a 'confidence' float between 0 and 1, an 'escalate_recommended' boolean indicating whether a human should review the decision, and a 'flags' array listing any caveats or concerns about the decision.","failureModes":["Malformed or missing 'options' field returns validation error","Insufficient context for meaningful arbitration may yield low confidence score with escalate_recommended: true","Ambiguous or contradictory constraints may produce a hedged verdict with caveats in the flags array","Network or service errors return non-200 HTTP status with no verdict payload","Edge cases with only one option may produce trivially high confidence"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when an agent needs to resolve a decision between two or more discrete options with traceable reasoning and a confidence signal — especially useful in automated pipelines where downstream actions depend on a structured verdict and an escalation flag is needed to route low-confidence decisions to human review. Prefer this over general-purpose LLM prompting when you need a consistent JSON schema with a confidence score and explicit escalation logic built in.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-15T12:34:11.692Z","isFirstParty":false}