{"uid":"cap_2yvOWMyet9eVEsb_HCJ_W","slug":"business-frameworks-market-node-verdict-decision-rule-94f4f596","name":"Business Frameworks: Market Node Verdict Decision Rule","description":"Business Frameworks · business-frameworks/market/decide/verdict@1.2 — the decision rule for a node's verdict — binding, transient, pass-through or open — from capacity, lead time against the horizon, suppliers building, documented relief and how the price is set, as inputs, rule, action and check. Call when a node's position has to be ruled before any price is read; returns 234 tokens of original synthesis (terse 167); to run it on your own figures, POST /apply/market/decide/verdict.","url":"https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/node/market/decide/verdict?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET"],"type":"string"},"queryParams":{"type":"object","properties":{}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"example":{"type":"object"}}}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.05","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.05/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.05","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.05","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_CaUdxdQ625bpCwWplFrgv","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.05","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Returns the decision rule that classifies a supply chain node's market position as binding, transient, pass-through, or open, based on capacity, lead time, supplier activity, documented relief, and pricing method.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Using the Business Frameworks market verdict rule, classify this node: its capacity is tight, lead time exceeds the planning horizon, no documented relief is in place, suppliers are actively building, and price is set by the market — is it binding, transient, pass-through, or open?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Pre-pricing node verdict for procurement","prompt":"Before we read any prices for our key input component, classify the node: capacity is constrained, lead time is longer than our 12-week horizon, there's no documented supply relief, suppliers are ramping builds, and price is market-set — what verdict do I get?"},{"title":"Supply chain bottleneck audit","prompt":"I need to audit which of our nodes are truly binding versus just transient before our quarterly review — can you run the market verdict rule on a node where lead time is within horizon, capacity is moderate, and there's documented relief already in place?"},{"title":"Vendor negotiation posture check","prompt":"We're entering negotiations with a supplier and want to know our node's verdict first — capacity is partially relieved, lead time is at the edge of our horizon, the supplier isn't actively building, and pricing is cost-plus. Is this node binding, pass-through, or open?"}],"resultDescription":"A structured synthesis of approximately 234 tokens (terse: 167) containing: the classified verdict for the node (binding, transient, pass-through, or open), the governing decision rule, the recommended action, and a check condition — derived from inputs of capacity, lead time vs. horizon, supplier build activity, documented relief, and price-setting method.","failureModes":["Missing required input fields returns a validation error","Ambiguous or out-of-range input values may produce an indeterminate verdict","Service unavailability on the Workers.dev edge returns a 5xx error","Malformed GET request without correct query parameters may return 400","x402 payment failure blocks access before any computation occurs"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need to formally classify a supply chain or procurement node's market position before any price is read or recorded — specifically when you must apply a structured decision rule (binding/transient/pass-through/open) derived from capacity status, lead time relative to horizon, supplier build signals, documented relief, and pricing method. Prefer it over generic supply chain tools when you need a reproducible, framework-consistent verdict that feeds downstream pricing or sourcing logic.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-17T06:47:41.451Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"business-frameworks-market-node-verdict-decision-rule-94f4f596"}