{"uid":"cap_-n3TFdxHpUk2cZWjTb49y","slug":"tablepulse-board-game-head-to-head-comparison-a5fc91bd","name":"TablePulse Board Game Head-to-Head Comparison","description":"Head-to-head board-game comparison — mechanics, complexity, replayability, and a use-case-specific verdict for 2-4 titles, grounded in current web reviews (never BoardGameGeek data).","url":"https://tablepulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/table/compare","method":"GET","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","required":["input"],"properties":{"input":{"type":"object","required":["type","method"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string","const":"http"},"method":{"enum":["GET","HEAD","DELETE"],"type":"string"},"queryParams":{"type":"object","properties":{"lang":{"type":"string","description":"en | de | fr | es | it | ja | pt | ar"},"games":{"type":"string","description":"Wingspan, Everdell | Catan, Ticket to Ride (required — 2-4 titles, comma-separated)"},"use_case":{"type":"string","description":"family game night | 2-player date night (optional)"}}}},"additionalProperties":false},"output":{"type":"object","required":["type"],"properties":{"type":{"type":"string"},"errors":{"type":"object","description":"Documented error responses, keyed by HTTP status code","additionalProperties":{"type":"object","required":["description"],"properties":{"example":{"type":"object"},"description":{"type":"string"}}}},"example":{"type":"object"}}}}},"responseSchema":{"type":"json","example":{"games_compared":["Wingspan","Everdell"],"overall_verdict":"Wingspan edges out for solo-friendliness; Everdell wins for narrative theme."}},"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.1","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.1/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.1","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.1","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_BWW_ycqpMAkF5Kmd_tWlV","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.1","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Compares 2–4 board games side-by-side on mechanics, complexity, and replayability, delivering a use-case-specific verdict grounded in current web reviews (excluding BoardGameGeek).","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you compare Wingspan, Everdell, and Viticulture head-to-head on mechanics, complexity, and replayability — I want to know which one is best for a group of adults who are intermediate players looking for a nature-themed Euro game?","exampleUseCases":null,"resultDescription":"A structured side-by-side comparison of 2–4 board games covering their mechanics, complexity level, replayability, and a verdict tailored to the specified use case or player context, all sourced from current web reviews rather than BoardGameGeek.","failureModes":["Game title not recognized or too obscure — endpoint may return a not-found or low-confidence result","Fewer than 2 or more than 4 titles provided — request likely rejected or truncated","Web review sources unavailable for very new or niche titles — verdict may be limited","Ambiguous game name (e.g. 'Pandemic' could refer to multiple editions) — endpoint may ask for clarification or default to base version"],"whenToPreferThis":"Use this endpoint when a user is deciding between specific named board game titles and needs a structured, opinionated comparison rather than a general recommendation. Ideal when the user already has 2–4 games in mind and wants a verdict for a particular context (e.g. couples, beginners, competitive players). Prefer this over the general recommendation endpoint when the candidate titles are already known.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-09-15T12:39:18.546Z","isFirstParty":false}