{"uid":"cap_-8X-bKuYQoQuNHSE5Xm5f","slug":"vendor-evaluation-record-quality-audit-numeric-row-ordering-da8c0b01","name":"Vendor Evaluation — Record Quality Audit + Numeric Row Ordering","description":"Vendor evaluation — Record quality audit + Numeric row ordering: Record quality audit + Numeric row ordering for supplied vendor evaluation records (supplied_score, maximum_score). Up to 200 rows; 2 independent reports using shared local analytical engines. No live lookup, prediction, professional assessment or external action. 0.01 USDC includes 2 supplied-data reports for up to 200 rows.","url":"https://market.datapackvibe.com/x402/assistant-ib26-company-10-007?utm_source=zero.xyz","method":"POST","headers":{},"bodySchema":{"type":"object","properties":{"rows":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","required":["row_id","company_group","date","supplied_score","maximum_score"],"properties":{"date":{"type":"string","default":"","pattern":"^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$","maxLength":10},"row_id":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80,"minLength":1},"company_group":{"type":"string","default":"","maxLength":80},"maximum_score":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000},"supplied_score":{"type":["number","null"],"maximum":1000000000000,"minimum":-1000000000000}},"additionalProperties":false},"default":[{"date":"2026-10-01","row_id":"row-1","company_group":"group-a","maximum_score":1,"supplied_score":10},{"date":"2026-10-02","row_id":"row-2","company_group":"group-b","maximum_score":2,"supplied_score":20},{"date":"2026-10-03","row_id":"row-3","company_group":"group-a","maximum_score":3,"supplied_score":15},{"date":"2026-10-04","row_id":"row-4","company_group":"group-b","maximum_score":4,"supplied_score":30}],"maxItems":200,"minItems":1},"field":{"enum":["supplied_score","maximum_score"],"type":"string","default":"supplied_score"}}},"responseSchema":null,"example":null,"exampleRequest":null,"tags":["x402"],"displayCostAmount":"0.01","displayCostAsset":"USDC","priceDynamic":false,"priceHint":null,"priceStatus":"priced","priceSource":"probe","requiresHandshake":false,"reviewCount":0,"rating":{"score":"0.00","successRate":"0.00","reviews":0,"stars":null,"state":"unrated"},"availabilityStatus":"unknown","priceObserved":null,"sessionDeposit":null,"pricing":{"kind":"static","summary":"$0.01/call","primary":{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"},"accepted":[{"kind":"static","protocol":"x402","network":"base","amountUsd":"0.01","per":"call","confidence":"exact"}]},"paymentMethods":[{"uid":"pm_xYa56MyZGIa85VkW4s8gd","protocol":"x402","methodType":"crypto","chain":"base","mode":"charge","costAmount":"0.01","costPer":"request","priority":0,"asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","unit":"request","depositMicros":null,"planRef":null}],"brandName":null,"brandSlug":null,"brandBaseUrl":null,"brandDocsUrl":null,"whatItDoes":"Runs two local analytical reports on vendor evaluation records: a data quality audit and a numeric row ordering, for up to 200 rows of supplied_score and maximum_score data.","exampleAgentPrompt":"Can you run a record quality audit and numeric row ordering on these vendor evaluation records — I have rows with row_id, company_group, date, supplied_score, and maximum_score fields, and I want both reports based on the supplied_score field?","exampleUseCases":[{"title":"Vendor scorecard data quality check","prompt":"I have 150 vendor evaluation records with supplied_score and maximum_score for different company groups. Can you audit them for data quality issues and also rank the rows numerically by supplied_score?"},{"title":"Procurement team score ranking","prompt":"Our procurement team submitted vendor scores for Q3 — can you take these records with row_id, company_group, date, supplied_score, and maximum_score and give me both a quality audit and a numeric ordering by maximum_score?"},{"title":"Spotting bad data before reporting","prompt":"Before I finalize the vendor evaluation report, can you run a quality audit and numeric row ordering on my 80 evaluation rows so I can catch any bad or missing scores before sending to leadership?"}],"resultDescription":"Returns two independent analytical reports: (1) a record quality audit flagging data issues, nulls, or anomalies in the vendor evaluation rows, and (2) a numeric row ordering ranking rows by the selected field (supplied_score or maximum_score). Both reports are computed locally from the supplied data with no external lookups.","failureModes":["More than 200 rows submitted — exceeds the maximum row limit","Missing required fields (row_id, company_group, date, supplied_score, or maximum_score) cause validation errors","Invalid date format (not YYYY-MM-DD) causes schema rejection","Field enum value outside 'supplied_score' or 'maximum_score' causes an error","Empty rows array returns an error","Numeric values outside the allowed range cause rejection"],"whenToPreferThis":"Choose this endpoint when you need both a data quality audit and a numeric ordering report on vendor evaluation records in a single call for up to 200 rows. It is ideal for pre-reporting data validation, procurement analytics, and vendor ranking workflows where you supply the data directly and need offline, local analysis without any external data lookups or predictions.","instructions":null,"reviewSummary":null,"reviewSummaryHighlights":null,"reviewSummaryConcerns":null,"reviewSummaryGeneratedAt":null,"activationCount":0,"lastUsedAt":null,"lastSuccessfullyRanAt":null,"lastHealthCheckAt":"2026-10-19T06:45:49.061Z","isFirstParty":false,"canonicalSlug":"vendor-evaluation-record-quality-audit-numeric-row-ordering-da8c0b01"}